UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, DC 20549
FORM 10-Q
(Mark One) |
||||||
x | Quarterly Report Pursuant to Section 13 or 15 (d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 |
For the quarterly period ended September 26, 2009
or
¨ | Transition Report Pursuant to Section 13 or 15 (d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 |
For the transition period from to
Commission file number 1-10948
Office Depot, Inc.
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)
Delaware | 59-2663954 | |
(State or other jurisdiction of incorporation or organization) |
(I.R.S. Employer Identification No.) | |
6600 North Military Trail; Boca Raton, Florida | 33496 | |
(Address of principal executive offices) | (Zip Code) |
(561) 438-4800
(Registrants telephone number, including area code)
(Former name, former address and former fiscal year, if changed since last report)
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes x No ¨
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files) . Yes ¨ No ¨
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of large accelerated filer, accelerated filer and smaller reporting company in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act. (Check one):
Large accelerated filer | x | Accelerated filer | ¨ | |||||||
Non-accelerated filer | ¨ | Smaller reporting company | ¨ | |||||||
(Do not check if a smaller reporting company) |
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act). Yes ¨ No x
The number of shares outstanding of the registrants common stock, as of the latest practicable date: At September 26, 2009 there were 274,719,322 outstanding shares of Office Depot, Inc. Common Stock, $0.01 par value.
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
(In thousands, except share and per share amounts)
(Unaudited)
As of September 26, 2009 |
As of December 27, 2008 |
As of September 27, 2008 | |||||||
Assets |
|||||||||
Current assets: |
|||||||||
Cash and cash equivalents |
$ | 692,886 | $ | 155,745 | $ | 394,574 | |||
Receivables, net |
1,165,003 | 1,255,735 | 1,450,220 | ||||||
Inventories |
1,176,659 | 1,331,593 | 1,460,499 | ||||||
Deferred income taxes |
19,502 | 196,192 | 144,209 | ||||||
Prepaid expenses and other current assets |
170,454 | 183,122 | 166,917 | ||||||
Total current assets |
3,224,504 | 3,122,387 | 3,616,419 | ||||||
Property and equipment, net |
1,281,066 | 1,557,301 | 1,623,858 | ||||||
Goodwill |
19,431 | 19,431 | 1,338,183 | ||||||
Other intangible assets |
26,360 | 28,311 | 103,453 | ||||||
Other assets |
353,875 | 540,796 | 537,500 | ||||||
Total assets |
$ | 4,905,236 | $ | 5,268,226 | $ | 7,219,413 | |||
Liabilities and stockholders equity |
|||||||||
Current liabilities: |
|||||||||
Trade accounts payable |
$ | 1,061,345 | $ | 1,251,808 | $ | 1,351,016 | |||
Accrued expenses and other current liabilities |
1,249,575 | 1,173,201 | 1,196,732 | ||||||
Income taxes payable |
4,854 | 8,803 | 11,447 | ||||||
Short-term borrowings and current maturities of |
60,265 | 191,932 | 420,979 | ||||||
Total current liabilities |
2,376,039 | 2,625,744 | 2,980,174 | ||||||
Deferred income taxes and other long-term liabilities |
665,758 | 585,861 | 585,573 | ||||||
Long-term debt, net of current maturities |
667,025 | 688,788 | 519,348 | ||||||
Total liabilities |
3,708,822 | 3,900,393 | 4,085,095 | ||||||
Commitments and contingencies |
|||||||||
Redeemable preferred stock, net |
340,218 | | | ||||||
Stockholders equity: |
|||||||||
Office Depot, Inc. stockholders equity: |
|||||||||
Common stock - authorized 800,000,000 shares of $.01 par value; issued and outstanding shares 280,634,590 in 2009, 280,800,135 in December 2008 and 280,862,835 in September 2008 |
2,806 | 2,808 | 2,809 | ||||||
Additional paid-in capital |
1,195,005 | 1,194,622 | 1,187,383 | ||||||
Accumulated other comprehensive income |
241,619 | 217,197 | 449,854 | ||||||
Retained earnings (accumulated deficit) |
(528,575) | 6,270 | 1,545,281 | ||||||
Treasury stock, at cost 5,915,268 shares in 2009, 5,938,059 shares in December 2008 and 5,976,950 shares in September 2008 |
(57,733) | (57,947) | (58,311) | ||||||
Total Office Depot, Inc. stockholders equity |
853,122 | 1,362,950 | 3,127,016 | ||||||
Noncontrolling interest |
3,074 | 4,883 | 7,302 | ||||||
Total stockholders equity |
856,196 | 1,367,833 | 3,134,318 | ||||||
Total liabilities and stockholders equity |
$ | 4,905,236 | $ | 5,268,226 | $ | 7,219,413 | |||
This report should be read in conjunction with the Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements (Notes) herein and the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements in the Office Depot, Inc. Form 10-K filed February 24, 2009 (the 2008 Form 10-K).
2
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
(In thousands, except per share amounts)
(Unaudited)
13 Weeks Ended | 39 Weeks Ended | |||||||||||
September 26, 2009 |
September 27, 2008 |
September 26, 2009 |
September 27, 2008 | |||||||||
Sales |
$ | 3,029,207 | $ | 3,657,857 | $ | 9,078,612 | $ | 11,224,947 | ||||
Cost of goods sold and occupancy costs |
2,169,084 | 2,633,416 | 6,544,179 | 8,048,310 | ||||||||
Gross profit |
860,123 | 1,024,441 | 2,534,433 | 3,176,637 | ||||||||
Store and warehouse operating and selling expenses |
715,439 | 844,189 | 2,201,342 | 2,522,689 | ||||||||
General and administrative expenses |
177,480 | 176,362 | 524,273 | 550,136 | ||||||||
Amortization of deferred gain on building sale |
| (1,873) | | (5,619) | ||||||||
Operating profit (loss) |
(32,796) | 5,763 | (191,182) | 109,431 | ||||||||
Other income (expense): |
||||||||||||
Interest income |
24 | 1,908 | 1,936 | 8,417 | ||||||||
Interest expense |
(17,242) | (16,405) | (51,905) | (45,631) | ||||||||
Miscellaneous income (expense), net |
9,369 | 2,999 | 6,222 | 17,175 | ||||||||
Earnings (loss) before income taxes |
(40,645) | (5,735) | (234,929) | 89,392 | ||||||||
Income tax expense |
358,400 | 1,538 | 302,312 | 30,661 | ||||||||
Net earnings (loss) |
(399,045) | (7,273) | (537,241) | 58,731 | ||||||||
Less: Net loss attributable to the noncontrolling interest |
(1,011) | (575) | (2,396) | (1,342) | ||||||||
Net earnings (loss) attributable to Office |
(398,034) | (6,698) | (534,845) | 60,073 | ||||||||
Preferred stock dividends |
14,931 | | 15,417 | | ||||||||
Income (loss) available to common shareholders |
$ | (412,965) | $ | (6,698) | $ | (550,262) | $ | 60,073 | ||||
Earnings (loss) per share: |
||||||||||||
Basic |
$ | (1.51) | $ | (0.02) | $ | (2.02) | $ | 0.22 | ||||
Diluted |
(1.51) | (0.02) | (2.02) | 0.22 | ||||||||
Weighted average number of common shares outstanding: |
||||||||||||
Basic |
274,194 | 272,939 | 272,554 | 272,726 | ||||||||
Diluted |
274,194 | 272,939 | 272,554 | 273,073 |
This report should be read in conjunction with the Notes herein and the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements in the 2008 Form 10-K.
3
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
(In thousands)
(Unaudited)
39 Weeks Ended | ||||||
September 26, 2009 |
September 27, 2008 | |||||
Cash flow from operating activities: |
||||||
Net earnings (loss) |
$ | (537,241) | $ | 58,731 | ||
Adjustments to reconcile net earnings (loss) to net cash provided by operating activities: |
||||||
Depreciation and amortization |
161,765 | 192,345 | ||||
Charges for losses on inventories and receivables |
57,390 | 100,353 | ||||
Valuation allowance on deferred tax assets |
321,566 | | ||||
Deferred income taxes |
7,039 | 39,951 | ||||
Changes in working capital and other |
256,639 | 46,399 | ||||
Net cash provided by operating activities |
267,158 | 437,779 | ||||
Cash flows from investing activities: |
||||||
Capital expenditures |
(74,057) | (277,818) | ||||
Acquisitions, net of cash acquired, and related payments |
| (101,786) | ||||
Release of restricted cash |
6,037 | 18,100 | ||||
Purchase of assets held for sale and sold |
| (39,772) | ||||
Proceeds from assets sold |
147,731 | 85,286 | ||||
Other |
1,213 | | ||||
Net cash provided by (used in) investing activities |
80,924 | (315,990) | ||||
Cash flows from financing activities: |
||||||
Proceeds from exercise of stock options and sale of stock under employee stock purchase plans |
33 | 658 | ||||
Tax benefits from employee share-based payments |
| 292 | ||||
Treasury stock additions from employee related plans |
| (1,015) | ||||
Debt issuance costs |
| (39,498) | ||||
Proceeds from issuance of redeemable preferred stock, net |
324,801 | | ||||
Proceeds (payments) of debt under asset based credit facility |
(139,098) | 365,000 | ||||
Net payments on long- and short-term borrowings |
(8,483) | (268,923) | ||||
Net cash provided by financing activities |
177,253 | 56,514 | ||||
Effect of exchange rate changes on cash and cash equivalents |
11,806 | (6,683) | ||||
Net increase in cash and cash equivalents |
537,141 | 171,620 | ||||
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period |
155,745 | 222,954 | ||||
Cash and cash equivalents at end of period |
$ | 692,886 | $ | 394,574 | ||
This report should be read in conjunction with the Notes herein and the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements in the 2008 Form 10-K.
4
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Unaudited)
Note A Summary of Significant Accounting Policies
Basis of Presentation: Office Depot, Inc., including consolidated subsidiaries, is a global supplier of office products and services. Fiscal years are based on a 52- or 53-week period ending on the last Saturday in December. The Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheet at December 27, 2008 has been derived from audited financial statements at that date. The Condensed Consolidated Statement of Cash Flows for the 39-week period ended September 27, 2008 has been corrected to present debt issuance costs of approximately $39 million as financing activities consistent with the 2008 audited financial statements. These debt issuance costs were previously reported as operating activities. The condensed consolidated interim financial statements as of September 26, 2009 and September 27, 2008, and for the 13-week and 39-week periods ended September 26, 2009 (also referred to as the third quarter of 2009 and the year-to-date 2009) and September 27, 2008 (also referred to as the third quarter of 2008 and the year-to-date 2008) are unaudited. However, in our opinion, these financial statements reflect adjustments (consisting only of normal, recurring items) necessary to provide a fair presentation of our financial position, results of operations and cash flows for the periods presented. In addition to the normal, recurring items recorded for interim financial statement presentation, we recognized expenses associated with exit and other activities because the related accounting criteria were met during the period. We have included the balance sheet from September 27, 2008 to assist in analyzing our company.
These interim results are not necessarily indicative of the results that should be expected for the full year. For a better understanding of Office Depot, Inc. and its condensed consolidated financial statements, we recommend reading these condensed interim financial statements in conjunction with the audited financial statements for the year ended December 27, 2008, which are included in our 2008 Annual Report on Form 10-K (the 2008 Form 10-K), filed with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC).
Cash Management: Our cash management process generally utilizes zero balance accounts which provide for the reimbursement of the related disbursement accounts on a daily basis. Accounts payable and accrued expenses as of September 26, 2009, December 27, 2008 and September 27, 2008 included $70 million, $71 million and $98 million, respectively, of disbursements not yet presented for payment drawn in excess of disbursement account book balances, after considering existing offset provisions. We may borrow to meet working capital and other needs throughout any given quarter, which may result in higher levels of borrowings and invested cash within the period. At the end of the quarter, excess cash may be used to minimize borrowings outstanding at the balance sheet date.
Fair Value of Financial Instruments: The estimated fair values of financial instruments recognized in the Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets have been determined using available market information, information from unrelated third party financial institutions and appropriate valuation methodologies, primarily discounted projected cash flows. However, considerable judgment is required when interpreting market information and other data to develop estimates of fair value. There were no significant differences between the carrying values and fair values of our financial instruments as of September 26, 2009 or December 27, 2008 except as disclosed below.
Short-term Assets and Liabilities: The fair values of cash and cash equivalents, short-term investments, receivables, accounts payable and accrued expenses and other current liabilities approximate their carrying values because of their short-term nature.
5
Notes Payable: The fair value of the senior notes was determined based on quoted market prices. The following table reflects the difference between the carrying value and fair value of the senior notes as of September 26, 2009 and December 27, 2008:
September 26, 2009 | December 27, 2008 | |||||||
(In thousands) | Carrying Value |
Fair Value |
Carrying Value |
Fair Value | ||||
$400 million senior notes |
$400,198 | $334,500 | $400,278 | $206,000 |
Interest Rate Swaps, Foreign Currency and Fuel Contracts: The fair values of our interest rate swaps, foreign currency contracts and fuel contracts are the amounts receivable or payable to terminate the agreements at the reporting date, taking into account current interest and exchange rates. The values are based on market-based inputs or unobservable inputs that are corroborated by market data. There were no interest rate swap agreements in place as of September 26, 2009 or December 27, 2008, and the amounts receivable or payable under foreign currency and fuel contracts were not significant as of these dates.
New Accounting Pronouncements: The Financial Accounting Standards Board (the FASB) has codified a single source of U.S. Generally Accepted Accounting Principles (GAAP), the Accounting Standards Codification. Unless needed to clarify a point to readers, we will refrain from citing specific section references when discussing application of accounting principles or addressing new or pending accounting rule changes.
In June 2009, the FASB issued new rules relating to the transfer of financial assets. These rules require entities to provide more information regarding sales of securitized financial assets and similar transactions, particularly if the entity has continuing exposure to the risks related to transferred financial assets. They also eliminate the concept of a qualifying special-purpose entity, change the requirements for derecognizing financial assets and require additional disclosures. The rules become effective for fiscal years beginning after November 15, 2009. Although we have not completed our analysis, we currently do not anticipate that these rules will have a material effect on our financial condition, results of operations or cash flows.
Also in June 2009, the FASB issued rules which modify how a company determines when an entity that is insufficiently capitalized or is not controlled through voting (or similar rights) should be consolidated. The FASB clarified that the determination of whether a company is required to consolidate an entity is based on, among other things, an entitys purpose and design and a companys ability to direct the activities of the entity that most significantly impact the entitys economic performance. An ongoing reassessment is required of whether a company is the primary beneficiary of a variable interest entity. Additional disclosures are also required about a companys involvement in variable interest entities and any significant changes in risk exposure due to that involvement. These rules are effective for fiscal years beginning after November 15, 2009. Although we have not completed our analysis, we currently do not anticipate that these rules will have a material effect on our financial condition, results of operations or cash flows.
In September, the FASB ratified an amendment to accounting rules addressing revenue recognition for arrangements with multiple revenue-generating activities. The amendment addresses how revenue should be allocated to separate elements which could impact the timing of revenue recognition. The amendment will be effective prospectively for revenue arrangements entered into or materially modified in fiscal years beginning on or after June 15, 2010. Early adoption is permitted. Companies may elect, but are not required, to apply retrospectively to all prior periods. We have not completed our assessment of this amendment on our financial condition, results of operations or cash flows.
6
Note B Redeemable Preferred Stock
On June 23, 2009, Office Depot, Inc. issued 274,596 shares of 10.00% Series A Redeemable Convertible Participating Perpetual Preferred Stock, par value $0.01 per share (Series A Preferred Stock), and 75,404 shares of 10.00% Series B Redeemable Conditional Convertible Participating Perpetual Preferred Stock, par value $0.01 per share (Series B Preferred Stock), to funds advised by BC Partners, Inc., for $350 million (collectively, the Preferred Stock). In compliance with the rules of the New York Stock Exchange (NYSE), Office Depot requested shareholder approval for conversion and voting rights for these shares. Approval was received at the shareholder meeting on October 14, 2009. Certain provisions in the original Preferred Stock documents that would have been effective if shareholder approval was not received are no longer relevant.
The initial liquidation value of $1,000 per preferred share and the conversion rate of $5.00 per common share allow the two series of preferred stock to be initially convertible into 70 million shares of common stock. The conversion rate is subject to anti-dilution adjustments. Until converted or otherwise redeemed, the Preferred Stock is recorded outside of permanent equity on the Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets because certain redemption conditions are not solely within the control of Office Depot. The balance is presented inclusive of accrued dividends and net of approximately $25 million of fees, including issuance costs paid for investment banking, legal and accounting fees, and $3.5 million paid to BC Partners, approximately $2.8 million of which was returned to the investing funds as a portion of a transaction funding fee.
Dividends are payable quarterly, beginning on October 1, 2009 and will be paid in cash only to the extent that the company has funds legally available for such payment and a cash dividend is declared by the companys board of directors. The companys credit facility currently limits the ability to make such payments. If not paid in cash, an amount equal to the cash dividend due will be added to the liquidation preference and measured for accounting purposes at fair value. After the third anniversary of issuance, the dividend rate will be reduced to:
(i) | 7.87% if at any time the closing price of the companys common stock is greater than or equal to $6.62 per share for a period of 20 consecutive trading days, or |
(ii) | 5.75% if at any time the closing price of the companys common stock is greater than or equal to $8.50 per share for a period of 20 consecutive trading days. |
The Preferred Stock also may participate in dividends on common stock, if declared. However, if the closing price of the common stock on the record date for a dividend payment is less than $45.00 per share, the company may not declare or pay a cash dividend on the common stock per share for any fiscal quarter in excess of the Preferred Stock dividend amounts.
On September 23, 2009, the board of directors resolved that an amount equal to the stated dividend rate on the Preferred Stock payable on October 1, 2009 should be added to the liquidation preference of the respective Series A and Series B shares, in lieu of making a cash payment. The dividend has been accrued through September 26, 2009 by a charge against additional paid-in capital and an increase to the Preferred Stock carrying value. The company measured the fair value of the dividend using a binomial simulation model that captured the intrinsic value of the underlying common stock on the declaration date and the option value of the shares and future dividends. Our model used a risk-free rate of 3.18%, a ten-year volatility of 63.5% and other assumptions including probability simulations of various outcomes. This technique resulted in a fair value estimate of approximately $14.9 million, or approximately $6.3 million above the increase in the liquidation preference amounts of the Preferred Stock for the third quarter of 2009. An increase in the liquidation preference in lieu of a cash payment has no impact on the statement of cash flows. The following table reflects the changes in redeemable preferred stock.
7
(In thousands) | Redeemable Preferred Stock, net | ||
Balance at December 27, 2008 |
$ | | |
Issuance of redeemable preferred stock |
350,000 | ||
Dividends accrued at the stated rate |
9,139 | ||
Liquidation preference |
359,139 | ||
Fair value in excess of dividends accrued at the stated rate |
6,278 | ||
Fees and other |
(25,199) | ||
Balance at September 26, 2009 |
$ | 340,218 | |
The Preferred Stock is redeemable, in whole or in part, at the option of the company at any time after June 23, 2012, subject to the right of the holder to first convert the preferred stock the company proposes to redeem. The redemption price is initially 107% of the liquidation preference amount plus any accrued but unpaid dividends and decreases by 1% each year until reaching 100% after June 23, 2019. At any time after June 23, 2011, if the closing price of the common stock is greater than or equal to $9.75 per share for a period of 20 consecutive trading days, the Preferred Stock is redeemable at 100% of the liquidation preference amount plus any accrued but unpaid dividends, in whole or in part, at the option of the company, subject to the right of the holder to first convert the Preferred Stock the company proposes to redeem.
The Preferred Stock is redeemable at the option of the holder at 101% of the liquidation preference amount plus any accrued but unpaid dividends in the event of a change of control of the company (as defined in the Certificate of Designations for each series), or if the company commences a voluntary bankruptcy, consents to the entry of an order against it in an involuntary bankruptcy, consents to the appointment of a custodian for all or substantially all of its property, makes a general assignment for the benefit of creditors or changes its primary business, or if the common stock ceases to be listed for trading on any of the NASDAQ Global Select Market, the NASDAQ Global Market or the NYSE without the simultaneous listing on another of such exchanges.
For so long as the Investors own 10% or more of the outstanding common stock on an as-converted basis, the affirmative vote of at least a majority of the shares of the Preferred Stock then outstanding and entitled to vote is required for (i) the declaration or payment of a dividend or distribution on the common stock or any other stock that ranks junior to or equally with the Series A Preferred Stock, subject to certain conditions specified in the Certificate of Designations; (ii) the purchase, redemption or other acquisition by the company of any common stock or other stock ranking junior to or equal with the Series A Preferred Stock, subject to certain conditions specified in the Certificate of Designations; (iii) any amendment of the companys Certificate of Incorporation or the Series A Preferred Stock so as to adversely affect the relative rights, preferences, privileges or voting powers of the Series A Preferred Stock; or (iv) the authorization or issuance of, or reclassification into, any capital stock that would rank senior to or equal with the Series A Preferred Stock (including additional shares of Series A Preferred Stock).
In connection with the transaction, the company entered into an Investor Rights Agreement. Subject to certain exceptions, for so long as the Investors ownership percentage is equal to or greater than 10%, the approval of at least one of the directors designated to the companys board of directors by the Investors is required for the company to incur any indebtedness for borrowed money in excess of $200 million in the aggregate during any fiscal year if the ratio of the consolidated debt of the company and its subsidiaries to the trailing four quarter adjusted EBITDA, as defined, of the company and its subsidiaries, on a consolidated basis, is more than 4x. In addition, for so long as the Investors ownership percentage is (i) equal to or greater than 15%, the Investors are entitled to nominate three of our fourteen directors, (ii) less than 15% but more than 10%, the Investors are entitled to nominate two of our fourteen directors and (iii) less than 10% but more than 5%, the Investors are entitled to nominate one of our fourteen directors. On June 23, 2009, three directors designated by the Investors were elected to the companys board of directors.
8
Certain features of the Preferred Stock described above constitute derivatives separable from the preferred stock; however, at issuance those features had little or no value at September 26, 2009 and are not expected to have significant value for the foreseeable future.
In connection with issuance of the Preferred Stock, the companys board of directors eliminated 500,000 shares of previously authorized but not outstanding Junior Participating Preferred Stock, Series A. Further, the board of directors authorized issuance of 280,000 shares of Series A Preferred Stock, and authorized 80,000 shares of Series B Preferred Stock, of which 274,596 and 75,404, respectively, have been issued. Any such Series A or Series B Preferred Stock that is redeemed, purchased or otherwise acquired by the company or converted into another series of preferred stock shall revert to authorized but unissued shares of preferred stock.
Note C Asset Impairments, Exit Costs and Other Charges
During the fourth quarter of 2008, we performed an internal review of assets and processes with the goal of positioning the company to respond to the continued degradation in the global economy and to position the company for the economys eventual improvement. The results of that internal review led to decisions to close underperforming stores, close certain distribution facilities, exit certain businesses, write off certain assets that were not seen as providing sufficient future benefit, and undertake certain actions to improve liquidity. The review has been updated throughout 2009 and all activities associated with the planned actions are currently expected to be completed by the end of 2009. Expenses associated with future activities will be recognized as the individual plans are implemented and the related accounting recognition criteria are met. As with any estimate, the amounts may change when expenses are incurred. We manage the related costs and programs associated with these activities (collectively, the Charges) at a corporate level, and accordingly, these amounts are not included in determining Division operating profit.
The following table summarizes the Charges recognized for the year-to-date 2009 period by type of activity as well as changes in the related accrual balances.
(In millions) | Balance at December 27, 2008 |
Charges incurred |
Cash payments |
Non-cash and lease |
Currency and other adjustments |
Balance at September 26, 2009 | ||||||
Cost of goods sold |
$ | $ 11 | $ | $ (11) | $ | $ | ||||||
One-time termination benefits |
14 | 21 | (27) | | (1) | 7 | ||||||
Lease and contract obligations |
33 | 119 | (40) | 32 | 1 | 145 | ||||||
Asset impairments and accelerated depreciation |
| 28 | | (28) | | | ||||||
Other associated costs |
| 16 | (9) | (7) | | | ||||||
Total |
$ 47 | $ 195 | $ (76) | $ (14) | $ | $ 152 | ||||||
During the third quarter of 2009, we recognized approximately $40 million of Charges associated with these activities as the previously-identified plans were implemented and the related accounting recognition criteria were met. Approximately $34 million is included in store and warehouse operating and selling expenses, $5 million is included in general and administrative expenses and $1 million is included in cost of goods sold and occupancy costs on our Condensed Consolidated Statement of Operations. Implementation of these activities during the quarter resulted in charges primarily for lease accruals and severance expenses. Additionally, we recognized a non-cash loss of approximately $6 million in conjunction with the disposition of other assets during the third quarter of 2009. This loss is reflected in other associated costs in the preceding table.
9
During the year-to-date 2009 period, we recognized Charges of approximately $195 million, of which, $160 million is included in store and warehouse operating and selling expenses, $24 million is included in general and administrative expenses and $11 million is included in cost of goods sold and occupancy costs. Previously accrued lease related costs such as tenant improvement allowances and various rent credits have been reclassified to the accrued lease liability associated with facilities closed during the year-to-date 2009 period. The net effect of this reclassification was to lower the lease-related Charge recognized in the year-to-date 2009 period by approximately $32 million. The resulting liability reflects the companys best estimate of its obligations under these long-term arrangements, net of sublease assumptions, discounted at the companys current estimated unsecured borrowing rate. This accrued liability may be adjusted in future periods as actual sublease activity is better or worse than estimated. It is currently expected that any such adjustments, as well as accretion of this liability will be reflected as a component of corporate charges in future periods.
During the year-to-date 2009 period, we also entered into multiple sale and sale-leaseback transactions related to the strategic review and to enhance liquidity. Total proceeds from these transactions were approximately $148 million and are included in the investing section on our Condensed Consolidated Statement of Cash Flows. One transaction was the sale of an asset previously classified as a capital lease. Payments to satisfy the existing capital lease obligation are included in the financing section of the Condensed Consolidated Statement of Cash Flows. Losses on these transactions are included in the Charges above. Gains have been deferred and will reduce rent expense over the related leaseback periods. An additional sale and leaseback arrangement associated with operating properties included provisions that resulted in the transaction being accounted for as a financing. Accordingly, approximately $19 million has been included in long-term debt on the Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheet at September 26, 2009.
Charges for the third quarter of 2008 relating to a previous business review program totaled approximately $5 million. Approximately $4 million was included in store and warehouse operating and selling expenses and approximately $1 million was included in general and administrative expenses. The 2008 year to date Charges totaled approximately $32 million, of which, $23 million is presented in store and warehouse operating and selling expenses and approximately $9 million is presented in general and administrative expenses. The third quarter and year to date 2008 Charges primarily related to severance expenses.
See the 2008 Form 10-K for additional discussion of these activities.
Note D Stockholders Equity and Comprehensive Income
Effective at the beginning of the first quarter of 2009, the presentation of noncontrolling interests, previously referred to as minority interest, has been changed on the Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets to be reflected as a component of total stockholders equity and on the Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations to be a specific allocation of net earnings (loss). Earnings per share continue to be based on earnings attributable to Office Depot, Inc.
10
The following table reflects the changes in stockholders equity attributable to both Office Depot, Inc. and the noncontrolling interests of the subsidiaries in India, Sweden and South Korea which we have a majority, but not total, ownership interest.
(In thousands) | Attributable to Office Depot, Inc. |
Attributable to noncontrolling interest |
Total | ||||||
Stockholders equity at December 27, 2008 |
$ | 1,362,950 | $ | 4,883 | $ | 1,367,833 | |||
Comprehensive income: |
|||||||||
Net earnings (loss) |
(534,845) | (2,396) | (537,241) | ||||||
Other comprehensive income (loss): |
24,421 | 587 | 25,008 | ||||||
Comprehensive income (loss) |
(510,424) | (1,809) | (512,233) | ||||||
Preferred stock dividends |
(15,417) | | (15,417) | ||||||
Share transactions under employee and direct stock purchase plans |
(16) | | (16) | ||||||
Share-based payments (including income tax benefits and withholding) |
(3,948) | | (3,948) | ||||||
Amortization of long-term incentive stock grant |
19,977 | | 19,977 | ||||||
Stockholders equity at September 26, 2009 |
$ | 853,122 | $ | 3,074 | $ | 856,196 | |||
Stockholders equity at December 29, 2007 |
$ | 3,083,844 | $ | 15,564 | $ | 3,099,408 | |||
Comprehensive income: |
|||||||||
Net earnings (loss) |
60,073 | (1,342) | 58,731 | ||||||
Other comprehensive income (loss): |
(46,062) | 458 | (45,604) | ||||||
Comprehensive income (loss) |
14,011 | (884) | 13,127 | ||||||
Acquisition of majority-owned subsidiaries |
| 6,592 | 6,592 | ||||||
Purchase of subsidiary shares from noncontrolling interest |
| (13,970) | (13,970) | ||||||
Acquisition of treasury stock |
(1,015) | | (1,015) | ||||||
Share transactions under employee and direct stock purchase plans |
(477) | | (477) | ||||||
Exercise of stock options (including income tax benefits and withholding) |
1,307 | | 1,307 | ||||||
Amortization of long-term incentive stock grant |
29,346 | | 29,346 | ||||||
Stockholders equity at September 27, 2008 |
$ | 3,127,016 | $ | 7,302 | $ | 3,134,318 | |||
Comprehensive income includes all non-owner changes in stockholders equity and consists of the following:
Third Quarter | Year-to-Date | |||||||||||
(In thousands) | 2009 | 2008 | 2009 | 2008 | ||||||||
Net earnings (loss) |
$ | (399,045) | $ | (7,273) | $ | (537,241) | $ | 58,731 | ||||
Other comprehensive income (loss): |
||||||||||||
Foreign currency translation adjustments, net |
19,053 | (138,234) | 24,061 | (32,579) | ||||||||
Amortization of gain on cash flow hedge, net |
(415) | (415) | (1,244) | (1,244) | ||||||||
Change in deferred pension, net |
340 | | (2,466) | (11,470) | ||||||||
Change in deferred cash flow hedge, net |
1,921 | (186) | 4,657 | (311) | ||||||||
Total other comprehensive income (loss) |
20,899 | (138,835) | 25,008 | (45,604) | ||||||||
Comprehensive income (loss) |
(378,146) | (146,108) | (512,233) | 13,127 | ||||||||
Less: comprehensive income (loss) attributable to the noncontrolling interest |
(514) | (1,614) | (1,809) | (884) | ||||||||
Comprehensive income (loss) attributable to Office Depot, Inc. |
$ | (377,632) | $ | (144,494) | $ | (510,424) | $ | 14,011 | ||||
11
Note E Earnings Per Share
The following table represents the calculation of net earnings (loss) per common share:
Third Quarter | Year-to-Date | |||||||||||||
(In thousands, except per share amounts) | 2009 | 2008 | 2009 | 2008 | ||||||||||
Basic Earnings Per Share |
||||||||||||||
Numerator: |
||||||||||||||
Income (loss) available to common shareholders |
$ | (412,965) | $ | (6,698) | $ | (550,262) | $ | 60,073 | ||||||
Denominator: |
||||||||||||||
Weighted-average shares outstanding |
274,194 | 272,939 | 272,554 | 272,726 | ||||||||||
Basic earnings (loss) per share |
$ | (1.51) | $ | (0.02) | $ | (2.02) | $ | 0.22 | ||||||
Diluted Earnings Per Share |
||||||||||||||
Numerator: |
||||||||||||||
Net earnings (loss) attributable to Office Depot, Inc. |
$ | (398,034) | $ | (6,698) | $ | (534,845) | $ | 60,073 | ||||||
Denominator: |
||||||||||||||
Weighted-average shares outstanding |
274,194 | 272,939 | 272,554 | 272,726 | ||||||||||
Effect of dilutive securities: |
||||||||||||||
Stock options and restricted stock |
5,475 | 79 | 2,985 | 347 | ||||||||||
Redeemable preferred stock |
70,000 | | 24,616 | | ||||||||||
Diluted weighted-average shares outstanding |
349,669 | 273,018 | 300,155 | 273,073 | ||||||||||
Diluted earnings (loss) per share |
N/A | N/A | N/A | $ | 0.22 | |||||||||
Following the issuance of the redeemable preferred stock on June 23, 2009, basic earnings per share is computed after consideration of preferred stock dividends. Diluted earnings per share is based on earnings before preferred stock dividends, but after assumed conversion into common stock unless such computation results in a number that is less dilutive, as it does in both the third quarter and year-to-date 2009. Accordingly, diluted earnings (loss) per share is indicated as not applicable (N/A) in the table above. The diluted share amounts for the 2009 periods and the third quarter of 2008 are provided for informational purposes, as the net loss for the periods causes basic earnings (loss) per share to be the most dilutive.
Shares of redeemable preferred stock have conditional rights to participate in common stock dividends as described in Note B, but those conditions were not met for the quarter. A two class security earnings per share presentation will be provided for any period in which the conditions are met.
Awards of options and nonvested shares representing approximately an additional 14 million shares of common stock were outstanding for the quarter ended September 26, 2009 but were not included in the computation of diluted earnings per share because their effect would have been antidilutive.
12
Note F Division Information
Office Depot operates in three segments: North American Retail Division, North American Business Solutions Division, and International Division. The following is a summary of our significant accounts and balances by segment (or Division), reconciled to consolidated totals.
Sales | ||||||||||||||
Third Quarter | Year-to-Date | |||||||||||||
(In thousands) | 2009 | 2008 | 2009 | 2008 | ||||||||||
North American Retail Division |
$ | 1,288,304 | $ | 1,578,525 | $ | 3,850,749 | $ | 4,725,040 | ||||||
North American Business Solutions Division |
880,351 | 1,054,213 | 2,662,625 | 3,222,310 | ||||||||||
International Division |
860,552 | 1,025,119 | 2,565,238 | 3,277,597 | ||||||||||
Total |
$ | 3,029,207 | $ | 3,657,857 | $ | 9,078,612 | $ | 11,224,947 | ||||||
Division Operating Profit | ||||||||||||||
Third Quarter | Year-to-Date | |||||||||||||
(In thousands) | 2009 | 2008 | 2009 | 2008 | ||||||||||
North American Retail Division |
$ | 35,111 | $ | 11,947 | $ | 103,364 | $ | 90,037 | ||||||
North American Business Solutions Division |
21,294 | 39,049 | 76,902 | 147,917 | ||||||||||
International Division |
34,177 | 35,937 | 55,835 | 147,271 | ||||||||||
Total |
$ | 90,582 | $ | 86,933 | $ | 236,101 | $ | 385,225 | ||||||
A reconciliation of the measure of Division operating profit to consolidated earnings (loss) before income taxes is as follows:
| ||||||||||||||
Third Quarter | Year-to-Date | |||||||||||||
(In thousands) | 2009 | 2008 | 2009 | 2008 | ||||||||||
Total Division operating profit |
$ | 90,582 | $ | 86,933 | $ | 236,101 | $ | 385,225 | ||||||
Charges, as defined in Note C |
(40,077) | (5,346) | (195,139) | (31,626) | ||||||||||
Corporate general and administrative expenses (excluding Charges) |
(83,301) | (77,697) | (232,144) | (249,787) | ||||||||||
Amortization of deferred gain |
| 1,873 | | 5,619 | ||||||||||
Interest income |
24 | 1,908 | 1,936 | 8,417 | ||||||||||
Interest expense |
(17,242) | (16,405) | (51,905) | (45,631) | ||||||||||
Miscellaneous income (expense), net |
9,369 | 2,999 | 6,222 | 17,175 | ||||||||||
Earnings (loss) before income taxes |
$ | (40,645) | $ | (5,735) | $ | (234,929) | $ | 89,392 | ||||||
Goodwill by Division is as follows:
Goodwill | |||||||||||||
(In thousands) | September 26, 2009 |
December 27, 2008 |
September 27, 2008 | ||||||||||
North American Retail Division |
$ | | $ | | $ | 2,200 | |||||||
North American Business Solutions Division |
19,431 | 19,431 | 369,025 | ||||||||||
International Division |
| | 966,958 | ||||||||||
Total |
$ | 19,431 | $ | 19,431 | $ | 1,338,183 | |||||||
The changes in goodwill balances from the third quarter of last year primarily reflect the impairment charge recorded during the fourth quarter of 2008.
13
Note G Pension Disclosures
The components of net periodic pension cost for our foreign defined benefit plan are as follows:
Third Quarter | Year-to-Date | |||||||||||||
(In millions) | 2009 | 2008 | 2009 | 2008 | ||||||||||
Service cost |
$ | | $ | 0.3 | $ | | $ | 0.9 | ||||||
Interest cost |
2.4 | 2.9 | 6.7 | 9.1 | ||||||||||
Expected return on plan assets |
(1.7) | (2.7) | (4.8) | (8.4) | ||||||||||
Net periodic pension cost |
$ | 0.7 | $ | 0.5 | $ | 1.9 | $ | 1.6 | ||||||
Curtailment gain |
$ | | $ | | $ | | $ | (13.1) | ||||||
The pension plan was curtailed in 2008 and no incremental benefits are accruing to the participants. The plan was part of an entity acquired in 2003. The purchase and sale agreement included a provision whereby the seller is required to pay to the company an amount of unfunded benefit obligation as measured based on certain 2008 data. The company is in the process of resolving this uncertainty with the seller. We currently cannot predict the outcome of this matter.
For the year-to-date 2009 period, we have contributed approximately $3.8 million to our foreign pension plan. We currently anticipate making contributions of approximately $5 million for the full year 2009, inclusive of amounts to reduce the unfunded status of the plan.
Note H Income Taxes
During the third quarter of 2009, the company recognized income tax expense of $358.4 million. The expense primarily reflects valuation allowances totaling $321.6 million, with $279.1 million related to domestic deferred tax assets and $42.5 million related to foreign deferred tax assets. Additionally, the related adjustment to the projected full year 2009 effective tax rate resulted in the reversal of $39.0 million of benefits recognized during the first half of the year. The establishment of valuation allowances and development of projected annual effective tax rates requires significant judgment and is impacted by various estimates. Both positive and negative evidence, as well as the objectivity and verifiability of that evidence, is considered in determining the appropriateness of recording a valuation allowance on deferred tax assets. An accumulation of recent pre-tax losses is considered strong negative evidence in that evaluation. The domestic cumulative pre-tax results for the previous 36 month period became negative during the third quarter of 2009. Additionally, certain European operations are projected to reach cumulative 36 month pre-tax losses before the end of 2009 and there is greater uncertainty about the pace of economic recovery in that jurisdiction compared to the domestic outlook. Further, losses are likely in both jurisdictions before a projected return to profitability. While the company believes positive evidence exists with regard to the realizability of these deferred tax assets, it is not considered sufficient to outweigh the objectively verifiable negative evidence, including the cumulative 36 month pre-tax loss history. Deferred tax assets without valuation allowances remain in certain foreign tax jurisdictions where supported by the evidence.
We file a U.S. federal income tax return and other income tax returns in various states and foreign jurisdictions. With few exceptions, we are no longer subject to U.S. federal, state and local, or non-U.S. income tax examinations for years before 2000. Our U.S. federal filings for the years 2000 and 2002 through 2007 are under varying stages of routine examination, and it is not anticipated that all aspects of these examinations will be completed before 2010. Additionally, the U.S. federal tax return for 2008 is under concurrent year review. Significant international tax jurisdictions include the U.K., the Netherlands, France and Germany. Generally, we are subject to routine examination for years 2001 and forward in these jurisdictions. It is reasonably possible that certain of these audits will close within the next 12 months, which could result in a decrease of as much as $56 million or an increase of as much as $30 million to our accrued uncertain tax positions. Additionally, we anticipate that it is reasonably possible that new issues will be raised or resolved by tax authorities that may require changes to the balance of unrecognized tax benefits, however, an estimate of such changes cannot reasonably be made at this time.
14
Note I Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activity
As a global supplier of office products and services we are exposed to risks associated with changes in foreign currency exchange rates, commodity prices and interest rates. Our foreign operations are typically, but not exclusively, conducted in the currency of the local environment. We are exposed to the risk of foreign currency exchange rate changes when we make purchases, sell products, or arrange financings that are denominated in a currency different from the entitys functional currency. Depending on the settlement timeframe and other factors we may enter into foreign currency derivative transactions to mitigate those risks. We may designate and account for such qualifying arrangements as hedges. Gains and losses on these cash flow hedging transactions are deferred in accumulated other comprehensive income (OCI) and recognized in earnings in the same period as the hedged item. Transactions that are not designated as cash flow hedges are marked to market at each period with changes in value included in earnings. No foreign currency hedging contracts existed at the end of the third quarter of 2009. Historically, we have not entered into transactions to hedge our net investment in foreign operations but may in future periods.
We also are exposed to the risk of changing fuel prices from inbound and outbound transportation arrangements. Some transportation contracts may provide for specific identification of the fuel cost component such that the risk of fuel price changes may be offset by third-party contracts thereby allowing us to designate and qualify these offsetting contracts as cash flow hedges for accounting purposes. Deferred gains or losses associated with these arrangements would be recorded in OCI until such time as the hedged item impacts earnings. As of September 26, 2009, we had no qualifying fuel hedging contracts in place. The structure of certain other transportation arrangements, however, precludes applying hedge accounting. In those circumstances, we may enter into derivative transactions to offset the risk of commodity price changes, and the value of the derivative contract is marked to market at each reporting period with changes recognized in earnings. At the end of the third quarter, the company had entered into contracts for approximately 1.6 million gallons of fuel that will be settled monthly through December 2009.
Interest rate changes on our obligations may result from external market factors, as well as changes in our credit rating. We manage our exposure to market risks at the corporate level. Interest rate-sensitive assets and liabilities are monitored and assessed for market risk. Currently, no interest-rate related derivative arrangements are in place. OCI includes the deferred gain from a hedge contract terminated in a prior period. This deferral is being amortized to interest expense through 2013.
In certain markets, we may contract with third parties for our future energy needs. Such arrangements are not considered derivatives because they are within the ordinary course of business and are for physical delivery. Accordingly, these arrangements are not included in the tables below.
Our risk management policies allow the use of specified financial instruments for hedging identified exposures only; speculation is not permitted.
The following tables provide information on our hedging and derivative positions and activity.
Fair Value of Derivative Instruments | |||||
As of September 26, 2009 | |||||
(In thousands) | Balance Sheet Location | Fair Value | |||
Derivatives not designated as hedging instruments: |
|||||
Commodity contracts fuel |
Other current liabilities | $ | 1,568 | ||
Total derivatives |
$ | 1,568 | |||
15
(In thousands) | Location of gain/(loss) recognized in earnings |
Amount of gain/(loss) recognized in earnings | ||||||
Third Quarter 2009 |
Year-to-Date 2009 | |||||||
Derivatives not designated as hedging instruments: |
||||||||
Commodity contracts fuel |
Cost of goods sold and occupancy costs & Store and warehouse operating and selling expenses* |
$ | (1,568) | $ | (1,568) | |||
Foreign exchange contracts |
Miscellaneous income (expense), net | 2,618 | (7,707) | |||||
Total |
$ | 1,050 | $ | (9,275) | ||||
(In thousands) | Amount of gain/(loss) recognized in OCI |
Location of gain/(loss) reclassified from OCI into earnings |
Amount of gain/(loss) reclassified from OCI into earnings | |||||||||||
Third Quarter 2009 |
Year-to-Date 2009 |
Third Quarter 2009 |
Year-to-Date 2009 | |||||||||||
Commodity contracts |
$ | | $ | 2,919 | Cost of goods sold and occupancy costs & Store and warehouse operating and selling expenses* |
$ | (1,685) | $ | (6,800) | |||||
Total |
$ | | $ | 2,919 | $ | (1,685) | $ | (6,800) | ||||||
* | Approximately 60% of the losses for the third quarter and year-to-date 2009 are reflected in cost of goods sold and occupancy costs. The remaining 40% of the losses are reflected in store and warehouse operating and selling expenses. |
As of September 26, 2009, there were no arrangements requiring collateral. However, we may be required to provide collateral on certain arrangements in the future. The fair values of our foreign currency contracts and fuel contracts are the amounts receivable or payable to terminate the agreements at the reporting date, taking into account current exchange rates. The values are based on market-based inputs or unobservable inputs that are corroborated by market data.
Note J Investment in Unconsolidated Joint Venture
Since 1994, we have participated in a joint venture in Mexico, Office Depot de Mexico. Because we participate equally in this business with a partner, we account for this investment using the equity method. Our proportionate share of Office Depot de Mexicos net income or loss is presented in miscellaneous income, net in the Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations.
The following tables provide summarized unaudited information from the balance sheets and statements of earnings for Office Depot de Mexico:
(In thousands) | September 26, 2009 |
December 27, 2008 |
September 27, 2008 | ||||||
Current assets |
$ | 204,492 | $ | 207,661 | $ | 220,184 | |||
Non-current assets |
243,614 | 241,726 | 277,578 | ||||||
Current liabilities |
144,147 | 155,017 | 156,975 | ||||||
Non-current liabilities |
| | |
16
Third Quarter | Year-to-Date | |||||||||||||
(In thousands) | 2009 | 2008 | 2009 | 2008 | ||||||||||
Sales |
$ | 229,761 | $ | 278,272 | $ | 609,853 | $ | 733,017 | ||||||
Gross profit |
64,796 | 77,211 | 173,794 | 208,150 | ||||||||||
Net income |
16,903 | 22,469 | 41,076 | 56,493 |
The changes in balances and results from the prior year periods primarily reflect changes in foreign currency exchange rates.
During the first quarter of 2009, we received a $13.9 million dividend from this venture.
Note K Commitments and Contingencies
We are involved in litigation arising in the normal course of our business. As previously disclosed, the company continues to cooperate with the SEC in its formal order of investigation issued in January 2008 covering the matters previously subject to the informal inquiry that commenced July 2007. A formal order of investigation allows the SEC to subpoena witnesses, books, records, and other relevant documents. The matters subject to the investigation include contacts and communications with financial analysts, inventory receipt and reserves, timing of vendor payments, certain intercompany loans, certain payments to foreign officials, inventory obsolescence and timing and recognition of vendor program funds.
In early November 2007, two putative class action lawsuits were filed against the company and certain of its executive officers alleging violations of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. The allegations made in these lawsuits primarily related to the accounting for vendor program funds. Each of the foregoing lawsuits was filed in the Southern District of Florida and captioned as follows: (1) Nichols v. Office Depot, Inc., Steve Odland and Patricia McKay filed on November 6, 2007 and (2) Sheet Metal Worker Local 28 Pension Fund v. Office Depot, Inc., Steve Odland and Patricia McKay filed on November 5, 2007. On March 21, 2008, the court in the Southern District of Florida entered an Order consolidating the class action lawsuits (the Consolidated Lawsuit).
Lead plaintiff in the Consolidated Lawsuit, the New Mexico Educational Retirement Board, filed its Consolidated Amended Complaint on July 2, 2008. On September 2, 2008, Office Depot filed a motion to dismiss the Consolidated Amended Complaint on the basis that it failed to state a claim. On March 31, 2009, the court dismissed the Consolidated Amended Complaint, but allowed the lead plaintiff leave to amend. On April 20, 2009, the lead plaintiff filed a Second Consolidated Amended Complaint. On May 21, 2009, we filed a motion to dismiss the Second Consolidated Amended Complaint, which is currently pending before the court.
Note L Subsequent Events
Public entities must evaluate subsequent events through the date that the financial statements are issued. Accordingly, we have evaluated subsequent events through the time of filing these financial statements with the SEC on October 29, 2009.
At the special meeting of shareholders on October 14, 2009, the shareholders voted to approve (i) a proposal to allow conversion at the option of the holders of our Series A Preferred Stock in excess of 19.99% of the shares of our common stock and (ii) a proposal to allow conversion at the option of the holders of our Series B Preferred Stock into shares of our common stock and the right of the holders of the Series B Preferred Stock to vote with shares of common stock on an as-converted basis. As a result of this approval, the vesting of certain employee stock grants will accelerate. Corporate general and administrative expenses for the fourth quarter of 2009 will include approximately $9 million from the effect of this accelerated vesting.
17
Item 2. Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations
GENERAL
Office Depot, Inc., together with our subsidiaries, is a global supplier of office products and services. We sell to consumers and businesses of all sizes through our three segments (or Divisions): North American Retail Division, North American Business Solutions Division, and International Division.
Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations (MD&A) is intended to provide information to assist in better understanding and evaluating our financial condition and results of operations. We recommend that you read this MD&A in conjunction with our condensed consolidated financial statements and the notes to those statements included in Item 1 of this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q, as well as our 2008 Annual Report on Form 10-K (the 2008 Form 10-K), filed with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (the SEC).
This MD&A contains significant amounts of forward-looking information. Without limitation, when we use the words believe, estimate, plan, expect, intend, anticipate, continue, may, project, probably, should, could, will and similar expressions in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q, we are identifying forward-looking statements (as such term is defined in the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995). Our discussion of Risk Factors, found in Item 1A of this Form 10-Q and our 2008 Form 10-K, and Forward-Looking Statements, found immediately following the MD&A in our 2008 Form 10-K, apply to these forward-looking statements.
RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
OVERVIEW
A summary of factors important to understanding the results for the third quarter of 2009 is provided below and further discussed in the narrative that follows this overview.
| Third quarter sales decreased 17% to $3 billion when compared to the third quarter of 2008. Sales in North America were down 18%, and International sales decreased 16% in U.S. dollars and 9% in local currencies. North American Retail Division comparable store sales decreased 14% for the quarter. The change in exchange rates from the third quarter of 2008 unfavorably impacted sales reported in U.S. dollars by approximately $70 million. |
| Gross profit totaled $860 million in the third quarter of 2009, down 16% from the same period in 2008. This decline is attributable to lower sales volume, partially offset by lower charges for shrink and inventory valuation. |
| As part of our previously announced strategic reviews, we recorded $40 million of pre-tax charges in the third quarter of 2009 and $5 million of charges in the third quarter of 2008 (the Charges). Implementation of the related activities during the quarter resulted in charges primarily for lease accruals and severance expenses. |
| Total operating expenses were down 12% compared to the third quarter of 2008. This decrease primarily reflects lower payroll and advertising expenses as well as reductions in distribution costs and fixed asset impairments. These decreases were partially offset by the increase in Charges from the third quarter of 2008. |
| During the third quarter of 2009, we recorded a non-cash tax expense to establish valuation allowances on deferred tax assets of $321.6 million ($1.17 per share) and reversed $39.0 million of tax benefits recognized during the first half of 2009 because of the uncertainty of future realizability of these assets. The reversal of tax benefits previously recognized negatively impacted third quarter earnings per share by $0.14, of which $0.08 is associated with the Charges recorded during the first half of 2009. |
18
| We reported a loss available to common shareholders of $413 million for the third quarter of 2009 compared to $7 million in the same quarter of the prior year, and we reported a diluted loss per share of $1.51 in the third quarter of 2009 versus $0.02 in the same period a year ago. In the third quarter of 2009, after-tax Charges negatively impacted earnings per share by $0.20, of which, $0.08 represents the reversal of tax benefits on Charges recognized during the first half of 2009. After-tax Charges negatively impacted earnings per share by $0.01 in the third quarter of 2008. |
| We reported a loss available to common shareholders of $550 million for the year-to-date 2009 period compared to income available to common shareholders of $60 million in the same period of 2008, and we reported a diluted loss per share of $2.02 for the year-to-date 2009 period versus diluted earnings per share of $0.22 in the same period a year ago. In the year-to-date 2009 period, after-tax Charges negatively impacted earnings per share by $0.64. After-tax Charges negatively impacted earnings per share by $0.10 for the year-to-date 2008 period. |
| On June 23, 2009, we issued $350 million of redeemable preferred stock and received cash, net of fees paid, of approximately $325 million. During the third quarter of 2009, we accrued dividends on the redeemable preferred stock totaling approximately $15 million, measured at fair value. |
Charges and Division Results
Charges
During the fourth quarter of 2008, we performed an internal review of assets and processes with the goal of positioning the company to respond to the continued degradation in the global economy and to position the company for the economys eventual improvement. The results of that internal review led to decisions to close underperforming stores, close certain distribution facilities, exit certain businesses, write off certain assets that were not seen as providing sufficient future benefit, and undertake certain actions to improve liquidity. The review has been updated throughout 2009 and all activities associated with the planned actions are currently expected to be completed by the end of 2009. Expenses associated with future activities will be recognized as the individual plans are implemented and the related accounting recognition criteria are met. We currently estimate Charges to be recognized during the fourth quarter of 2009 to be approximately $60 million, bringing our estimate of 2009 total Charges to approximately $255 million. Accretion on discounted long-term accruals such as lease obligations, is projected to be $15 million for 2010 and declining amounts in subsequent periods. This expense will be included in store and warehouse operating and selling expenses and recognized at the corporate level, outside of Division operating profit. Positive and negative adjustments to these accrued balances may continue to impact corporate results in future periods. As with any estimate, the timing and amounts may change when projects are implemented and such changes may be significant. Also, changes in foreign currency exchange rates will have an impact on amounts reported in U.S. dollars related to foreign operations. Charges recognized in the third quarter and year-to-date 2008 periods related to a previous business review program.
Our measurement of Division operating profit excludes the Charges because they are evaluated internally at the corporate level. The Charges recognized during the third quarter and year-to-date 2009 and 2008 periods are included in the following lines in our Condensed Consolidated Statement of Operations.
(In millions) |
Third Quarter | Year-to-Date | ||||||||||
2009 | 2008 | 2009 | 2008 | |||||||||
Cost of goods sold and occupancy costs |
$ | 1 | $ | | $ | 11 | $ | | ||||
Store and warehouse operating and selling expenses |
34 | 4 | 160 | 24 | ||||||||
General and administrative expenses |
5 | 1 | 24 | 8 | ||||||||
Total Charges |
$ | 40 | $ | 5 | $ | 195 | $ | 32 | ||||
For additional information on the Charges, see Note C.
19
Other
The portion of General and Administrative (G&A) expenses considered directly or closely related to unit activity is included in the measurement of Division operating profit. Other companies may charge more or less G&A expenses to their divisions, and our results therefore may not be comparable to similarly titled measures used by some other entities. Our measure of Division operating profit should not be considered as an alternative to operating income or net earnings determined in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America.
We have prepared our financial statements in each period based on information available at the time, however, changes in estimates may impact our financial statements in future periods. For additional information on our accounting estimates, see Critical Accounting Policies in our 2008 Form 10-K.
North American Retail Division
Third Quarter | Year-to-Date | |||||||||||
(Dollars in millions) |
2009 | 2008 | 2009 | 2008 | ||||||||
Sales |
$ | 1,288.3 | $ | 1,578.5 | $ | 3,850.7 | $ | 4,725.0 | ||||
% change |
(18)% | (11)% | (19)% | (8)% | ||||||||
Division operating profit |
$ | 35.1 | $ | 11.9 | $ | 103.4 | $ | 90.0 | ||||
% of sales |
2.7% | 0.8% | 2.7% | 1.9% |
Third quarter sales in the North American Retail Division were $1.3 billion, down 18% from the prior year, due in part to having 117 fewer stores open in the third quarter of 2009 versus the prior year period. Comparable store sales in the 1,144 stores in the U.S. and Canada that have been open for more than one year decreased 14% for the quarter and 16% for year to date 2009. While transaction counts were down in the third quarter of 2009 compared to the same period last year, a drop in average order value was the greater contributor to our sales decline. Consistent with previous periods, the overall decrease in sales was driven by macroeconomic factors as consumers and small business customers continued to curtail their spending. Additionally, our commitment to proactively reduce promotions in select categories resulted in lower sales compared to the third quarter of 2008. Within each of our three major product categories of supplies, technology and furniture, we experienced a sales decline compared to the third quarter of 2008. The negative comparable store sales continue to be driven by fewer sales of higher priced, discretionary categories in furniture and technology. Also, as a result of many schools starting later in 2009 than in 2008, our Back-to-School strategy of delaying promotional activity until key purchasing weeks lowered our comparable store sales, however, this strategy allowed us to deliver overall improved profitability for this important season. Geographically, California and Florida continued to produce the weakest comparable store sales trends for the third quarter and our best performing markets were Canada, the Northeast and the Midwest.
The North American Retail Division reported operating profit of approximately $35 million in the third quarter of 2009, compared to $12 million in the same period of the prior year. On a year to date basis, Division operating profit was approximately $103 million in 2009 compared to $90 million in 2008. This measure of operating performance is consistent with the internal reporting of results used to manage the business and allocate resources and does not include charges associated with the strategic decisions made as part of the internal review initiated during the fourth quarter of 2008. Please see Charges discussion in the MD&A Overview section above.
The improvement in Division operating profit for the third quarter of 2009 was driven by a continued improvement in product margins and reduced operating expenses, including lower depreciation as a result of fixed asset impairments recorded during the second half of 2008. Other factors contributing to the increase in Division operating profit were lower charges for asset impairments and a comparative benefit from closing the underperforming stores identified as part of the strategic review we initiated in the fourth quarter of 2008. These positive factors were partially offset by the
20
unfavorable impact our sales volume decline had on gross margin and operating expenses (the flow through impact). The factors discussed for the third quarter results are largely the same factors impacting year to date 2009 compared to year to date 2008.
At the end of the third quarter of 2009, Office Depot operated 1,158 office products stores throughout the U.S. and Canada. We opened one store, closed one store and relocated three stores during the period. We closed 113 stores during year to date 2009, of which 112 were closed as part of the strategic review initiated in the fourth quarter of 2008. We plan to open ten or fewer new stores over the remainder of 2009.
Our inventory per store at the end of the third quarter of 2009 was approximately $669,000, down 14% from the end of the third quarter of 2008. Average inventory per store in the third quarter of 2009 was $723,000, down 19% from the same period last year. These declines are a result of improved inventory management and our reduced exposure to higher dollar value inventory items. The integration of our North American Retail and Business Solutions supply chains will make it difficult to accurately calculate inventory per store data. Therefore, we plan to stop reporting this measure in 2010.
As we look at the fourth quarter, we are cautiously optimistic about sales. Customer spending remains tight, and we believe that the upcoming holiday season will be very competitive. We expect Division operating results to be better year-over-year, excluding the negative impact of asset impairment charges recognized in the fourth quarter of 2008.
North American Business Solutions Division
Third Quarter | Year-to-Date | |||||||||||
(Dollars in millions) |
2009 | 2008 | 2009 | 2008 | ||||||||
Sales |
$ | 880.4 | $ | 1,054.2 | $ | 2,662.6 | $ | 3,222.3 | ||||
% change |
(16)% | (10)% | (17)% | (7)% | ||||||||
Division operating profit |
$ | 21.3 | $ | 39.0 | $ | 76.9 | $ | 147.9 | ||||
% of sales |
2.4% | 3.7% | 2.9% | 4.6% |
Third quarter sales in the North American Business Solutions Division were $880 million, down 16% compared to the third quarter of 2008. This decline was principally driven by a decrease in the number of customer transactions. In our large, national accounts, we continued to experience extremely aggressive pricing from some of our competitors. On a product category basis, the Division experienced continued weakness in durables such as furniture, technology and peripherals, as customers delayed their purchases of these products in favor of consumables like paper, ink and toner. Our expectation is that the purchasing trends will continue in the near term. In the third quarter of 2009, the sales decline in California worsened and continued to exceed the overall rate of decline for the Division in the period, however, the sales decline in Florida was slightly less than the overall rate of decline for the Division. These two states continue to represent approximately 30% of Division revenue and about one-third of the revenue decline from the third quarter of 2008.
The North American Business Solutions Division reported operating profit of approximately $21 million in the third quarter of 2009, compared to $39 million in the same period of the prior year. This decrease was driven by the flow through impact of lower sales levels as well as lower product margins, reflecting a less profitable product mix and cost increases that could not be passed on to our customers. Reductions in operating expenses, including lower advertising costs, partially offset these negative factors. On a year to date basis, Division operating profit totaled $77 million in 2009 compared to $148 million in 2008. The factors discussed for the third quarter results are largely the same factors impacting year to date 2009 compared to year to date 2008.
21
As we look at the fourth quarter, we expect the year-over-year sales decline to improve as we compare against our weak sales results from the fourth quarter of 2008. In addition, we anticipate that Division operating profit in the fourth quarter will reflect an improvement over the fourth quarter of 2008 as a result of the many initiatives that we have undertaken to optimize our profitability.
International Division
Third Quarter | Year-to-Date | |||||||||||
(Dollars in millions) |
2009 | 2008 | 2009 | 2008 | ||||||||
Sales |
$ | 860.6 | $ | 1,025.1 | $ | 2,565.2 | $ | 3,277.6 | ||||
% change |
(16)% | 3% | (22)% | 7% | ||||||||
% change in local currency sales |
(9)% | (2)% | (10)% | (1)% | ||||||||
Division operating profit |
$ | 34.2 | $ | 35.9 | $ | 55.8 | $ | 147.3 | ||||
% of sales |
4.0% | 3.5% | 2.2% | 4.5% |
The International Division reported third quarter sales of $861 million, a decrease of 16% in U.S. dollars. Local currency sales decreased 9%, with all but a few countries in which we operate reporting sales declines compared to the third quarter of 2008. The U.K., France, and Germany accounted for more than half of the overall decrease in local currency sales. Similar to North America, concerns regarding high unemployment levels, reductions in workforce, tight credit conditions and the global recession are having a negative effect on both business investment and office supply expenditures. Although we are becoming more effective at retaining our higher value customers, sales in the direct business declined 10% in local currency because of continued softness in higher priced items such as furniture and technology. Sales in the contract business declined 9% in local currency as larger businesses have reduced their workforces and their discretionary spending on office supplies. Additionally, the International Divisions sales were reduced as a result of our previously announced plans to exit the retail business in Japan.
The International Division reported an operating profit of approximately $34 million in the third quarter of 2009, compared to $36 million in the same period of the prior year. Division operating profit for year to date 2009 was $56 million, compared to $147 million for the same period of 2008. This measure of operating performance is consistent with the internal reporting of results used to manage the business and allocate resources and does not include charges associated with the strategic decisions made as part of the internal review initiated during the fourth quarter of 2008. Please see Charges discussion in the MD&A Overview section above.
The change in Division operating profit for the third quarter of 2009 resulted as the flow through impact of lower sales levels was almost completely offset by lower operating expenses. These factors are largely the same factors impacting year to date 2009 compared to year to date 2008. Additionally, the curtailment of a U.K. pension plan resulted in a $13 million gain in the second quarter of 2008, contributing to the decrease in the year to date period. The change in exchange rates from the corresponding prior year period unfavorably impacted operating profit in U.S. dollars by approximately $3 million for the quarter and $12 million for the year-to-date period, compared to the same periods in 2008.
Looking forward, economic data indicates that the recovery has begun in Asia and Europe but our customers are still reducing costs and finding ways to decrease overall spending. Therefore, we do not anticipate a significant change in demand in the near future. As a result of our sales growth and cost reduction initiatives, we are optimistic about our fourth quarter performance. We expect that our fourth quarter revenue decline in local currency will be less than the third quarter of 2009, and we expect Division operating profit to be slightly lower than the third quarter of 2009.
22
Corporate and Other
General and Administrative Expenses: Total G&A increased slightly from $176 million in the third quarter of 2008 to $178 million in the third quarter of 2009. As noted above, the portion of G&A expenses considered directly or closely related to unit activity is included in the measurement of Division operating profit above. The remainder of the total G&A expenses are considered corporate expenses. A breakdown of G&A is provided in the following table:
Third Quarter | Year-to-Date | |||||||||||
(In millions) |
2009 | 2008 | 2009 | 2008 | ||||||||
Division G&A |
$ | 89.2 | $ | 97.3 | $ | 268.2 | $ | 292.1 | ||||
Corporate G&A |
88.3 | 79.1 | 256.1 | 258.0 | ||||||||
Total G&A |
$ | 177.5 | $ | 176.4 | $ | 524.3 | $ | 550.1 | ||||
Corporate G&A includes Charges of approximately $5 million in the third quarter of 2009 and $1 million in the third quarter of 2008. After considering the impact of Charges recognized in the period, Corporate G&A increased by approximately $6 million during the third quarter of 2009 compared to the same period of 2008 primarily reflecting increased depreciation expense and performance-based variable pay. The increase in depreciation expense resulted primarily from the capital lease associated with our new corporate campus as well as the companys implementation of a new enterprise software system which was placed in service at the beginning of the third quarter of 2009.
Corporate G&A includes Charges of $24 million for the year to date 2009 period and $8 million for the same period of 2008. After considering the impact of Charges recognized in the period, Corporate G&A fell by approximately $18 million during year-to-date 2009 compared to the same period of 2008. This decrease primarily reflects reduced legal and professional fees and lower payroll costs, which were partially offset by increased performance-based pay and depreciation expense. Additionally, during the second quarter of 2008, the company initiated a voluntary exit incentive program for certain employees that resulted in a charge of approximately $6 million for severance expenses in the year-to-date 2008 period.
Corporate G&A for the fourth quarter of 2009 will include approximately $9 million from the effect of accelerated vesting of certain employee stock grants following approval of the redeemable preferred stock issuance. Also, change in control features in certain employment contracts could result in additional G&A expenses in future periods if covered executives are involuntarily, or in certain cases, voluntarily terminated.
During 2006, we sold our former corporate campus and leased the facility back as construction of a new facility was being completed. The amortization of the deferred gain on the sale recognized during year to date 2008 largely offset the rent expense incurred during the period.
Other income (expense): The increase in net interest costs in the third quarter was driven by increased interest expense, which resulted from the amortization of debt issuance costs related to our asset based credit facility and the interest expense recognized on the capital lease associated with our new corporate campus. We also experienced lower levels of interest income and capitalized interest compared to the third quarter of 2008. Partially offsetting these unfavorable items was a reduction in interest expense on borrowings as we did not borrow under our asset based credit facility during the third quarter of 2009. In addition to these factors, higher borrowing rates and lower investment rates contributed to the increase in net interest costs for the year to date 2009 period.
The increase in net miscellaneous income in the third quarter primarily relates to foreign currency transactions. During the third quarter of 2009, we recognized foreign currency gains compared to foreign currency losses in the third quarter of 2008. Partially offsetting this improvement were lower equity in earnings from our joint venture in Mexico, Office Depot de Mexico, which resulted primarily from changes in foreign currency exchange rates. In addition to these factors, the change in the year to date amount also reflects the comparison to a $5 million gain recognized in the first quarter of 2008 from the sale of a non-operating asset.
23
Other - Income Taxes: During the third quarter of 2009, the company recognized income tax expense of $358.4 million. The expense primarily reflects valuation allowances totaling $321.6 million, with $279.1 million related to domestic deferred tax assets and $42.5 million related to foreign deferred tax assets. Additionally, the related adjustment to the projected full year 2009 effective tax rate resulted in the reversal of $39.0 million of benefits recognized during the first half of the year. The establishment of valuation allowances and development of projected annual effective tax rates requires significant judgment and is impacted by various estimates. Both positive and negative evidence, as well as the objectivity and verifiability of that evidence, is considered in determining the appropriateness of recording a valuation allowance on deferred tax assets. An accumulation of recent pre-tax losses is considered strong negative evidence in that evaluation. Because of the downturn in our performance during this recessionary period, as well as the significant restructuring activities and charges we have taken in response, during the third quarter of 2009 our domestic cumulative pre-tax results for the past 36 months became negative. Additionally, certain European operations are projected to reach cumulative 36 month losses before the end of 2009 and there is greater uncertainty about the pace of economic recovery in that jurisdiction compared to the domestic outlook. While we have seen signs that cause us to be optimistic about the future, we are likely to be adding to those accumulated pre-tax losses in both jurisdictions before the projected return to profitability of these operations. We expect to be able to use some of these assets to reduce taxes payable in coming quarters or by carrying back to prior years. Further, we anticipate being able to remove the valuation allowances in future periods when positive evidence outweighs the negative evidence from the relevant look-back period, but the timing and amounts by jurisdiction currently cannot be reliably estimated. The short-term consequence of being unable to record deferred tax benefits will cause our effective tax rate to be volatile, possibly changing significantly from period to period. We anticipate an effective tax rate of approximately 10% to 15% for the full year 2009. However, the effective tax rate in future periods can be affected by variability in our mix of domestic and foreign income, the variance of actual results to projected results, utilization of deferred tax assets, the statutory tax rates in various jurisdictions, changes in the rules related to accounting for income taxes, outcomes from tax audits that regularly are in process and our assessment of the need for accruals for uncertain tax positions.
The company periodically seeks to limit future tax expense by entering into tax ruling agreements with international jurisdictions. It is possible that the company may have to concede significant tax attributes in the negotiating process which may increase tax expense. Such a concession should not have a near-term cash tax impact.
The 2008 third quarter tax expense includes a charge of approximately $8 million to reflect the enactment in July 2008 of a tax law change in the U.K., partially offset by a benefit of approximately $5 million to adjust tax provisions for the first two quarters of 2008 to the anticipated full year effective rate.
LIQUIDITY AND CAPITAL RESOURCES
At September 26, 2009, we had approximately $693 million of cash and cash equivalents and $694 million available under our asset based revolving credit facility based on the September borrowing base certificate. The challenging economic conditions impact the market for short-term liquidity, but we consider our resources adequate to satisfy our cash needs at least over the next twelve months. We anticipate that market conditions will continue to be challenging through the remainder of 2009 and into 2010, and in response, we are focused on maximizing cash flow. We have made strong progress towards reducing inventory levels and remain focused on accelerating the collection of our accounts receivable balances. During the first half of 2009, we entered into sale-leaseback transactions and sales of certain assets, and during the third quarter of 2009, we entered into a committed factoring arrangement that allows us to sell certain foreign trade receivables to a third party which provides up to approximately $85 million additional liquidity, depending on the level of
24
eligible receivables and currency exchange rates. As of the end of the third quarter of 2009, we had not sold any receivables under this agreement. Our asset based revolving credit facility is also available to support working capital needs.
At September 26, 2009, we had no borrowings outstanding on our asset based revolving credit facility (the Facility). There were letters of credit outstanding under the Facility totaling approximately $171.0 million. An additional $0.7 million of letters of credit were outstanding under separate agreements. Average borrowings under the Facility from December 27, 2008 to June 27, 2009 were approximately $180 million at an average interest rate of 3.92%. We did not borrow under our asset based credit facility during the third quarter of 2009.
Redeemable Preferred Stock Issuance
On June 23, 2009, we issued 274,596 shares of 10.00% Series A Redeemable Convertible Participating Perpetual Preferred Stock (Series A Preferred Stock), and 75,404 shares of 10.00% Series B Redeemable Conditional Convertible Participating Perpetual Preferred Stock (Series B Preferred Stock together the Preferred Stock) for net proceeds of approximately $327 million. Each share of Preferred Stock has an initial liquidation preference of $1,000 and the conversion rate of $5.00 per common share allow the two series of preferred stock to be initially convertible into 70 million shares of common stock. The conversion rate is subject to anti-dilution adjustments.
In compliance with the rules of the New York Stock Exchange (NYSE), Office Depot requested shareholder approval for conversion and voting rights for these shares. Approval was received at the shareholder meeting on October 14, 2009. Certain provisions in the original Preferred Stock documents that would have been effective if shareholder approval was not received are no longer relevant.
On September 23, 2009, the board of directors resolved that an amount equal to the stated dividend rate on the Preferred Stock accrued through October 1, 2009 should be added to the liquidation preference of the respective Series A and Series B Preferred Stock, in lieu of making a cash payment. The dividend resulted in $14.9 million in the aggregate being charged against additional paid-in capital and added to the Preferred Stock carrying value as of September 26, 2009. The company measured the fair value of the dividend using a binomial simulation model that captured the intrinsic value of the underlying common stock on the declaration date and the option value of the shares and future dividends. This increase in liquidation preference in lieu of a cash payment has no impact on the statement of cash flows.
Dividends are payable quarterly and will be paid in cash only to the extent that the company has funds legally available for such payment and a cash dividend is declared by the companys board of directors. The companys credit facility currently limits the ability to make such payments. If not paid in cash, an amount equal to the cash dividend due will be added to the liquidation preference and measured for accounting purposes at fair value. The company may seek modifications to the credit facility to allow for dividends to be paid in cash. After the third anniversary of issuance the dividend rate will be reduced to (a) 7.87% if at any time the closing price of the companys common stock is greater than or equal to $6.62 per share for a period of 20 consecutive trading days, or (b) 5.75% if at any time the closing price of the companys common stock is greater than or equal to $8.50 per share for a period of 20 consecutive trading days.
After the third anniversary of issuance the Preferred Stock is redeemable, in whole or in part, at the option of the company, subject to the right of the holder to first convert the Preferred Stock the company proposes to redeem. The redemption price is initially 107% of the liquidation preference amount and decreases by 1% each year until reaching 100% after June 23, 2019. At any time after June 23, 2011, if the closing price of the common stock is greater than or equal to $9.75 per share for a period of 20 consecutive trading days, the Preferred Stock is redeemable at 100% of the liquidation preference amount, in whole or in part, at the option of the company, subject to the right of the holder to first convert the Preferred Stock the company proposes to redeem.
25
The Preferred Stock is redeemable at the option of the holder at 101% of the liquidation preference in the event of certain fundamental change provisions (as defined in the Certificate of Designations for each series), including sale, bankruptcy, or delisting of our common stock.
Based on our current assessment of 2009 cash flow and the issuance of the $350 million of preferred stock, we believe we have sufficient liquidity to withstand the continuation of difficult economic conditions.
Current Period Results
Year to date cash provided by operating activities totaled $267 million compared to $438 million during the same period last year. This decrease primarily reflects a reduction in business performance which was partially offset by changes in working capital and other. Depreciation and amortization decreased by approximately $31 million year over year primarily reflecting the impairment of fixed and intangible assets we recorded in the fourth quarter of 2008. The decrease in charges for losses on inventories and receivables resulted from lower charges for shrinkage. As previously discussed, the company recognized valuation allowances of approximately $322 million related to deferred tax assets during the third quarter of 2009. Due to the non-cash nature of that expense, it has been added back to our net loss in the Condensed Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows to arrive at cash provided by operating activities. The third quarter reversal of $39.0 million of tax benefits recognized during the first half of the year had no net impact on cash flows because of the year to date presentation of this financial statement. Changes in net working capital and other components resulted in a $257 million source of cash in the year to date 2009 period, compared to $46 million in the same period of 2008. The source in the 2009 period was driven by our continued focus on collecting accounts receivable balances and controlling our inventory levels. Additionally, the changes in working capital and other line item on the Condensed Consolidated Statement of Cash Flows includes a $14 million dividend received from our joint venture in Mexico as well as the impact of non-cash Charges and increases in accruals for severance and lease obligations recognized during the 2009 period. The source of cash in the 2008 period primarily reflected reduced inventory and receivable levels during the period as well as the timing of payments. The timing of payments is subject to variability quarter to quarter depending on a variety of factors, including the flow of goods, credit terms, timing of promotions, vendor production planning, new product introductions and working capital management. For our accounting policy on cash management, see Note A of the Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements.
Cash provided by investing activities was $81 million in the year to date 2009 period, compared to a use of $316 million in the same period last year. The cash inflow for the 2009 period reflects $148 million of proceeds from multiple sale and sale-leaseback transactions related to the strategic review and our efforts to enhance our liquidity. One transaction was the sale of an asset previously classified as a capital lease. Payments to satisfy the existing capital lease obligation are included in the financing section.
Year-to-date 2009 capital expenditures totaled approximately $74 million, compared to $278 million in the same period of 2008. The decrease primarily reflects a reduction in store openings as well as a decrease in spending related to our information systems and distribution networks. We anticipate capital expenditures for the full year 2009 to be approximately $125 million to $130 million. We believe our cash on hand, cash from operations, anticipated liquidity actions and our existing credit facility will be sufficient to satisfy our anticipated capital expenditures. During the 2009 period, $6 million of cash that had been held in a restricted account at the end of 2008 was released. Similarly, $18 million of restricted cash was released during the year-to-date 2008 period. Also, during 2008 period, we purchased certain non-operating assets for approximately $40 million. We sold certain of these non-operating assets in the first quarter of 2008, realizing a gain of approximately $5 million in that period. The use of cash in the 2008 period also included payments made to acquire controlling interests in our joint ventures in Sweden and India as well as payments made under put options to acquire all the remaining minority interest shares of our joint ventures in Israel and China.
26
Year to date cash provided by financing activities totaled $177 million compared to $57 million during the same period last year. The source in the 2009 period resulted from our issuance of redeemable preferred stock during the second quarter. As discussed above, we completed the $350 million issuance of redeemable preferred stock on June 23, 2009. These proceeds are shown net of fees paid of approximately $25 million on the transaction during the period. Uses of cash during the year to date 2009 period resulted from repayments of borrowings on our asset based credit facility, which totaled $139 million, and $34 million in capital lease payments. Also, during year-to-date 2009, we incurred approximately $19 million in debt as a result of a land sale and leaseback that was treated as a financing transaction as well as approximately $6 million of other short-term borrowings. Cash provided by financing activities in the 2008 period primarily reflects debt borrowings as well as debt issuance costs of approximately $39 million related to our asset based credit facility, conformed to our full year presentation.
Other
The sale and purchase agreement associated with the Guilbert acquisition in 2003 included a provision whereby the funding deficit in Guilberts U.K. defined benefit pension plan as at closing of the acquisition would be revalued five years after acquisition and the revalued deficit amount, calculated in accordance with the agreement, would be paid by the seller to the company. The actuary to the plan has prepared a calculation in accordance with the mechanism set out in the agreement, but the seller disputes the valuation. Arbitration of this issue is anticipated to extend into 2010. The company currently cannot predict the outcome of this issue. We have accounted for the deficit in the plan since acquisition and disclosed this element of continuing consideration in our annual reports. The companys claim against the seller does not eliminate our funding requirements associated with the plan. During 2008, the plan was curtailed and no incremental benefits are accruing to the participants. Also, we have entered into an agreement with the plans trustees to fund the existing deficit over a ten year period. U.K. law requires us to review the funding every three years to ensure progress is made toward eliminating the deficit. Currently, the company is making annual payments of approximately $5 million into the plan and is scheduled to agree with the plans trustees on the ensuing three-year funding targets during 2010.
CRITICAL ACCOUNTING POLICIES
Our condensed consolidated financial statements have been prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America. Preparation of these statements requires management to make judgments and estimates. Some accounting policies have a significant impact on amounts reported in these financial statements. A summary of significant accounting policies and a description of accounting policies that are considered critical may be found in our 2008 Form 10-K, filed on February 24, 2009, in the Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements, Note A, and the Critical Accounting Policies section.
New Accounting Pronouncements
The Financial Accounting Standards Board (the FASB) has codified a single source of U.S. Generally Accepted Accounting Principles (GAAP), the Accounting Standards Codification. Unless needed to clarify a point to readers, we will refrain from citing specific section references when discussing application of accounting principles or addressing new or pending accounting rule changes.
In June 2009, the FASB issued new rules relating to the transfer of financial assets. These rules require entities to provide more information regarding sales of securitized financial assets and similar transactions, particularly if the entity has continuing exposure to the risks related to transferred financial assets. They also eliminate the concept of a qualifying special-purpose entity, change the requirements for derecognizing financial assets and require additional disclosures. The rules become effective for fiscal years beginning after November 15, 2009. Although we have not completed our analysis, we currently do not anticipate that these rules will have a material effect on our financial condition, results of operations or cash flows.
27
Also in June 2009, the FASB issued rules which modify how a company determines when an entity that is insufficiently capitalized or is not controlled through voting (or similar rights) should be consolidated. The FASB clarified that the determination of whether a company is required to consolidate an entity is based on, among other things, an entitys purpose and design and a companys ability to direct the activities of the entity that most significantly impact the entitys economic performance. An ongoing reassessment is required of whether a company is the primary beneficiary of a variable interest entity. Additional disclosures are also required about a companys involvement in variable interest entities and any significant changes in risk exposure due to that involvement. These rules are effective for fiscal years beginning after November 15, 2009. Although we have not completed our analysis, we currently do not anticipate that these rules will have a material effect on our financial condition, results of operations or cash flows.
In September, the FASB ratified an amendment to accounting rules addressing revenue recognition for arrangements with multiple revenue-generating activities. The amendment addresses how revenue should be allocated to separate elements which could impact the timing of revenue recognition. The amendment will be effective prospectively for revenue arrangements entered into or materially modified in fiscal years beginning on or after June 15, 2010. Early adoption is permitted. Companies may elect, but are not required, to apply retrospectively to all prior periods. We have not completed our assessment of this amendment on our financial condition, results of operations or cash flows.
Item 3. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk
Interest Rate Risks
At September 26, 2009, there had not been a material change in the interest rate risk information disclosed in the Market Sensitive Risks and Positions subsection of the Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations set forth in Item 7 of our 2008 Form 10-K.
Foreign Exchange Rate Risks
At September 26, 2009, there had not been a material change in any of the foreign exchange risk information disclosed in the Market Sensitive Risks and Positions subsection of the Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations set forth in Item 7 of our 2008 Form 10-K.
Item 4. Controls and Procedures
We maintain controls and other procedures that are designed to ensure that information required to be disclosed by us in the reports that we file or submit under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the Exchange Act) is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in the SECs rules and forms. Disclosure controls and procedures include, without limitation, controls and procedures designed to ensure that information required to be in this report is accumulated and communicated to its management, including its principal executive officer and principal financial officer, as appropriate, to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure. Our management recognizes that any controls and procedures, no matter how well designed and operated, can only provide reasonable assurance of achieving their objectives and management necessarily applies its judgment in evaluating the possible controls and procedures.
28
Our management has evaluated, with the participation of its principal executive officer and principal financial officer, the effectiveness of its disclosure controls and procedures (as such term is defined in Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) under the Exchange Act) as of the end of the period covered by this report. Based upon that evaluation, our principal executive officer and principal financial officer have concluded that, as of the end of the period covered by this report, the companys disclosure controls and procedures were effective.
Changes in Internal Control over Financial Reporting
There has been no change in the companys internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the companys most recent fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the companys internal control over financial reporting.
29
We are involved in litigation arising in the normal course of our business. As previously disclosed, the company continues to cooperate with the SEC in its formal order of investigation issued in January 2008 covering the matters previously subject to the informal inquiry that commenced July 2007. A formal order of investigation allows the SEC to subpoena witnesses, books, records, and other relevant documents. The matters subject to the investigation include contacts and communications with financial analysts, inventory receipt and reserves, timing of vendor payments, certain intercompany loans, certain payments to foreign officials, inventory obsolescence and timing and recognition of vendor program funds.
In early November 2007, two putative class action lawsuits were filed against the company and certain of its executive officers alleging violations of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. The allegations made in these lawsuits primarily related to the accounting for vendor program funds. Each of the foregoing lawsuits was filed in the Southern District of Florida and captioned as follows: (1) Nichols v. Office Depot, Inc., Steve Odland and Patricia McKay filed on November 6, 2007 and (2) Sheet Metal Worker Local 28 Pension Fund v. Office Depot, Inc., Steve Odland and Patricia McKay filed on November 5, 2007. On March 21, 2008, the court in the Southern District of Florida entered an Order consolidating the class action lawsuits (the Consolidated Lawsuit).
Lead plaintiff in the Consolidated Lawsuit, the New Mexico Educational Retirement Board, filed its Consolidated Amended Complaint on July 2, 2008. On September 2, 2008, Office Depot filed a motion to dismiss the Consolidated Amended Complaint on the basis that it failed to state a claim. On March 31, 2009, the court dismissed the Consolidated Amended Complaint, but allowed the lead plaintiff leave to amend. On April 20, 2009, the lead plaintiff filed a Second Consolidated Amended Complaint. On May 21, 2009, we filed a motion to dismiss the Second Consolidated Amended Complaint, which is currently pending before the court.
In addition, in the ordinary course of business, our sales to and transactions with government customers may be subject to audits and review by governmental authorities and regulatory agencies. Many of these audits and reviews are resolved without incident; however, we have had several inquiries by certain governmental agencies into contract pricing, and additional inquiries may follow. While these claims may assert large demands, we do not believe that any of these matters, either individually or in the aggregate, will materially affect our financial position or the results of our operations.
With the exception of certain items that were updated in our Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended June 27, 2009, there have been no material changes in our risk factors from those disclosed in Part 1, Item 1A of our 2008 Form 10-K.
Item 2. Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds
Between December 2008 and May 2009, we issued approximately 23,000 unregistered shares of our common stock at an average price per share of $1.69 pursuant to our Direct Stock Purchase Plan (the Plan). Our registration statement on Form S-3 relating to the Plan expired on December 1, 2008. As a result, these shares were inadvertently sold under an expired registration statement and do not appear to qualify for an exemption from registration under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended. The purchasers of such shares consisted of existing stockholders of the company. We terminated the Plan on July 24, 2009 and will not issue any additional sales under the Plan.
30
On April 25, 2007, the board of directors authorized a common stock repurchase program whereby we were authorized to repurchase $500 million of our common stock. The company has not made any repurchases under this authorization, and the remaining authorized amount at September 26, 2009 was $500 million. The companys asset based credit facility includes limitations in certain circumstances on restricted payments including share repurchases and the payment of cash dividends. These restrictions are based on the then-current and pro-forma fixed charge coverage ratio and borrowing availability at the point of consideration. Further, so long as investors in the redeemable preferred stock own at least 10% of the common stock voting rights, on an as-converted basis, the affirmative vote of a majority of the shares of preferred stock then outstanding and entitled to vote is required for the declaration or payment of a dividend on common stock. The company has never declared or paid cash dividends on its common stock.
Exhibits
10.1 | Agreement for the Financing of Commercial Receivables, dated September 30, 2009, between Office Depot BS and Fortis Commercial Finance | |
10.2 | Specifications Relating to the Back-Up Line Attached to the Agreement for the Financing of Commercial Receivables, dated September 30, 2009, between Office Depot BS and Fortis Commercial Finance | |
10.3 | Seventh Amendment to Amended and Restated Merchant Services Agreement, dated October 13, 2009, between Office Depot, Inc. and Citibank N.A. | |
31.1 | Rule 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a) Certification of CEO | |
31.2 | Rule 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a) Certification of CFO | |
32 | Section 1350 Certification |
31
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.
OFFICE DEPOT, INC. (Registrant) |
||||||
Date: October 29, 2009 | By: /s/ Steve Odland | |||||
Steve Odland | ||||||
Chief Executive Officer and | ||||||
Chairman, Board of Directors | ||||||
(Principal Executive Officer) |
Date: October 29, 2009 | By: /s/ Michael D. Newman | |||||
Michael D. Newman | ||||||
Executive Vice President and | ||||||
Chief Financial Officer | ||||||
(Principal Financial Officer) |
Date: October 29, 2009 | By: /s/ Mark E. Hutchens | |||||
Mark E. Hutchens | ||||||
Senior Vice President | ||||||
and Controller | ||||||
(Principal Accounting Officer) |
32
Exhibit 10.1
Translation from French to English
SCHEDULE 1 |
AGREEMENT FOR THE FINANCING WITHOUT RECOURSE OF COMMERCIAL RECEIVABLES BY SUBROGATORY TRANSFER |
BETWEEN: OFFICE DEPOT BS, a French simplified limited company (SAS) with share capital of 148.568.500 , whose registered office is located in SENLIS (60300), 126, avenue du Poteau, registered with the Trade and Companies Registry under number ° 324 559 970, hereinafter referred to as the Client,
AND: FORTIS COMMERCIAL FINANCE, a French simplified limited company (SAS) with share capital of 33,865,055 whose registered office is located at 30, Quai de Dion Bouton, PUTEAUX (92800) registered with the Trade and Companies Registry under number 342 227 576, hereinafter referred to as FCF,
Article 1: Purpose / Scope of the agreement
The present Agreement allows the Client to obtain from FCF the financing, by subrogatory transfer without recourse, of any commercial receivables arising from its activity of supply of office products and furniture up to the amount specified at article 7.
To be eligible for the present Agreement, said receivables (the «Eligible Receivables») must meet all the following criteria:
- | Certain, liquid and denominated in euros, |
- | Corresponding to firm sales subject to effective deliveries or to achieved provision of services, |
- | For which payment terms are complying with the legal regulations in force and in any case, not exceeding 180 days following the invoice date, |
- | On all kind of debtors located in France metropolitan (excluding private individuals, debtors which are equally the Clients suppliers of office furniture and articles, or Office-Depot group members). |
The compliance with the conditions of eligibility of the transferred receivables is the Clients responsibility, FCF not having any control to operate; it being clarified that the Client will communicate to FCF, on its demand, any document or any useful information in connection with the operations.
The Client refrains from entering into any agreement (mobilization of receivables, factoring or other) allowing a third party to come into competition with FCF with regards to the Eligible Receivables.
Article 2: Current account Agreement
The transactions handled pursuant to the present Agreement are recorded in a current account opened in the name of the Client in the books of FCF; the sums due by FCF as well as all sums due by the Client pursuant to the present Agreement are recorded in such current account (the Current Account).
The reciprocal discounts, debts and receivables recorded in the Current Account constitute solely account entries, all such entries being indivisibly merged. Any debit balance arising from this merger will be immediately due and every credit balance will be immediately available.
The Client and FCF agree that the aforementioned reciprocal receivables and debts arising from the performance of the present Agreement are related and indivisible, in such a way that they constitute each others guarantee and do mutually set off with one another whereas the conditions required for legal compensation would not be met.
There may be opened as many sub-current-accounts in the name of the Client as necessary, which will all be part of the Current Account.
The Clients Current Account does not contain any overdraft authorization. Should a debit position be attained, in particular in respect of the payment of any receivables held by FCF against the Client, FCF is entitled to claim immediately the repayment of the corresponding amounts to the Client.
FCF shall send monthly to the Client a Current Account statement. Each statement will be deemed to reflect the reality and the accuracy of the operations between the Client and FCF, except for obvious errors or motivated and justified disputes, notified by the Client to FCF within 60 days as from the notification date. Should the monthly comparing
1/7
Translation from French to English
carried out by the Client between its subsidiary accounting of Receivables and the Current Account reveal any differences, the Client undertakes to proceed to all usual verifications and to inform FCF without delay of the results of its verifications.
The termination of the Agreement opens the closure period of the Current Account starting as from the date of notification of the termination. The definitive closure and the balance of the Current Account shall only be established subject to the settlement of all pending operations.
Article 3: Remittance of Receivables - Transfer of property
The Client transfers to FCF, on a weekly basis, and under a specification agreed by FCF, the list of the Eligible Receivables.
Transfer of title of the Eligible Receivables is made by means of conventional subrogation in accordance with article 1250-1° of the French Civil Code. By crediting the Current Account of the amount of the receivables transferred by the Client and which are listed in the summary forms, FCF becomes the sole holder of the title of the aforementioned receivables as a result and as from the day of their registration in the account. The amount of the transferred receivables is inscribed to the credit of the current account within 48 hours of the reception of the form at the latest.
To that effect, the Client shall sign upon the activation of the Agreement at the latest, a permanent subrogation form (quittance subrogative permanente) in favor of FCF, of which a template is appended to the present Agreement (Annex 3).
FCF is entitled to request at any time the provision of any document on the transferred receivables, in particular invoice, purchase orders (except for phone orders) and delivery notes. The Client has 30 days to deliver the documents. In particular instances, FCF may request the Client to do its best efforts to deliver the documents as soon as possible.
Article 4: Receivable management mandate
4-1: Purpose of Mandate
FCF hereby gives mandate to the Client to collect and receive payments regarding the transferred receivables. This mandate will not lead any obligation of payment from FCF; expenses and outlays of any kind will stay at the charge of the Client.
The procedures communicated by the Client to FCF during the diligences made prior to the signature of the present Agreement are attached to the Agreement. Any significant change to such procedures must firstly be accepted by FCF. The Client commits to apply the credit and collection procedures mentioned in Annex 6 and generally to exercise due care to protect FCFs rights.
The Client is dispensed of informing its debtors of the existence of the present agreement and of affixing on its invoices any clause of transfer (clause à ordre).
4-2: Payments
The payment instruments received by the Client for the transferred receivables shall be remitted on a dedicated bank account opened at Fortis Bank. The LCR and other kind of bills of exchange shall be remitted on the dedicated bank account by the Client at the date of invoice issuing or on receipt.
Debtor payments made by bank transfers shall be domiciliated on the bank accounts of the Client opened at BSD-CIN LA BANQUE POSTALE, LCL and BNP, named cashing accounts; for whatever purposes it may serve the claims in restoration of the balances of these accounts will have firstly been transferred to FCF in accordance with articles L. 313-23 & following of the Monetary and Financial code further to a security document which shall be signed at the latest upon the date of the first remittance of receivables. The template for the assignment agreement of professional receivables is appended as annex 4 and the templates for protocols regarding the operation of the cashing accounts are appended as annex 5. The references of the said cashing accounts will be reported on original invoices, and the balances of the cashing accounts will be transferred daily to the dedicated bank account, pursuant to an ad hoc agreement signed between the parties and the domiciled bank. It is understood that any credit transfer corresponding to a transferred receivable, received on any bank account other than the cashing bank account shall be immediately transferred to the dedicated account.
Pursuant to the terms of a particular functioning agreement to be concluded with each of the aforementioned banks, the Client refrains to operate those cashing accounts on debit or to change the domiciliation of the payments before having obtained previous agreement from FCF.
2/7
Translation from French to English
4-3: Power
The Client grants FCF full powers to endorse all payment title that might be made out to the order of the Client. The Client undertakes not to revoke such powers for so long as its current account in FCFs books remains open. The power shall be used by FCF only in case the mandate is revoked.
4-4: Reporting
The Client shall report, at the first remittance of receivables and at least twice a month, on the performance of the mandate by communicating to FCF the information described below in a format agreed by the Parties (for that purpose, FCF supplies the Client with a specification allowing it to prepare the corresponding files) :
- Itemized outstanding balance of the non identified debtors included in the scope of the agreement; the Client shall retain the invoices sold by bills of exchange payable in the balance forwarded to FCF.
- Actualized list of active debtors included in the scope of the application.
- Summary of the amount of the dilutions of the past 15 days. Generally, dilution are defined as any entry lessening the amount of the receivables transferred without cash counterpart on the dedicated bank account and more particularly as credit notes, discounts, rebates on the turnover, participation to advertisement, direct payments (except for purchase cards) and disputes (non-payment by a debtor for any other reason than insolvency as described in article 6 of the present Agreement as soon as the Client is being made aware of it and at the latest 120 days from the due date ).
- List of the bad debts accounted over the last elapsed fifteen days and registered in the 416 account category.
- Actualized statement of the provisions for end of year rebates and participation to advertisement.
According to the collected elements, FCF will compare the existing ledger in its books to the ledger transmitted by the Client; FCF is authorized to settle any unjustified difference by debiting the Statistical Dilution Reserve as defined in article 6 below.
In general, the Client acknowledges that FCF has the right to conduct any necessary verification regarding the transferred receivables including on its premises and books, after the appointment made with the Client to be decided within 48 business hours from the request of FCF, except in case of justified emergency. The Client hereby agrees to do everything in its power to cooperate with the conduct of such verifications.
4-5: Revocation of the Mandate
FCF may revoke the mandate 15 business days after a formal notice sent by registered letter with acknowledgment of receipt requested left unremedied in case:
- The Clients finances have worsen significantly;
- Dilutions (as defined in article 4-4) exceeding 10 % of the nominal amount VAT included of the transferred receivables, the calculation being established according to a method communicated by FCF and attached to the present document (Annex 7);
- Arrears above 30 days as from the due date exceeding 10% of the outstanding amount of transferred receivables, after deduction of the unallocated cash, the calculation being established according to a method communicated by FCF and attached to the present document (Annex 7);
- DSO noticed in FCF books is above 75 days, according to a method of calculation communicated by FCF and attached to the present document (Annex 7).
If the mandate is revoked, FCF will have to take over the collection of the transferred receivables; the Client hereby agrees to do everything to help assuring the debtors information on the revocation of the mandate and the notification of the new payment account details. In return of the taking over of the collection by FCF, the factoring fee will be increased by 0.20%. This pricing will apply as of the effective date of mandate revocation and will be applied to all receivable outstanding at this date.
In case Client makes a serious breach of contract, defined as any behavior likely to prevent FCF from benefiting from its rights according to the present document, FCF shall have the right to revoke the mandate without previous notice.
3/7
Translation from French to English
Article 5: Acceptance of debtors
On the signature of the present agreement, and then, two times a month, the Client will transmit to FCF the file of all debtors included in the application scope, mentioned in article 1. The debtors benefiting from an outstanding credit granted by the Client at the date of the audit prior to the signing of the Agreement benefit from a credit approval up to that amount. The new debtors for whom the outstanding is inferior or equal to 80,000 (eighty thousand) automatically benefit from a credit approval by default. For any new outstanding amount above 80,000 (eighty thousand) on a private debtor, the Client shall transmit to FCF any non confidential information in its possession allowing FCF to assess the solvency. Failing non confidential information in its possession is communicated, the approval is deemed refused.
FCF may decide at any time to reduce or terminate acceptance without that this reduction or termination lessen the amount of the transfer of receivables authorization of transfer mentioned in article 7 (60,000,000) granted to the Client, in which case it shall inform the Client of its decision by any means. Such decisions shall have immediate effect, although receivables corresponding to services rendered on or before the date on which the Client received notice shall continue to be accepted. All decisions to reduce or terminate acceptance shall have retroactive effect from 0.00 hours on the day of the decision.
The Client acknowledges that FCFs decisions concerning acceptance are intended for it alone, and agrees not to disclose them to any third party, including the relevant debtors.
Article 6: Statistical Dilution Reserve - Guarantee
FCF guarantees the risk of declared insolvency and default of payment of the debtors pursuant to the conditions stated herein. Recordation of receivables to the credit of the Current Account does not imply that such receivables are guaranteed. The non guaranteed receivables can be debited from the Current Account at any time.
The Client agrees FCF to debit its current account for the amounts necessary to build up a Statistical Dilution Reserve equal to 20% of the total outstanding of the amount of the Eligible Receivables transferred, by deducting 20% of the amount of each remittance form (bordereau de remise). The Statistical Dilution Reserve is intended to cover the amount of the dilutions (as defined in the article 4-4 above), and the bad debts (defined as corresponding to situations of declared insolvency, characterized by the opening of a procedure against a debtor mentioned in Book VI of the Commercial Code).
The retained amounts within the Statistical Dilution Reserve are blocked as cash collateral and are held by FCF in whole ownership and as a security. FCF will keep the amounts recorded at the credit of the Statistical Dilution Reserve in freehold and will therefore be able to set off its repayment obligation of these amounts automatically and up to the level of the balance potentially in debit in the Current Account at any time, and upon its definitive closure. All exceeding amount, if existing, is returned to the Client.
In case of foreclosure of the account by a Client creditor in FCFs hands, FCF will be debtor of a conditional receivable of restitution of the amounts which have been transferred in freehold and will therefore be in a position to use the sums available on the Clients Current Account in order to repay its own receivables.
It can be created as many sub accounts as necessary which will form an integral part of the Statistical Dilution Reserve.
Twice a month, FCF will take from the Statistical Dilution Reserve the amount of the dilutions and the bad debts noticed over the period.
In case the accumulated amount of dilutions and bad debts is higher than 8% of the transferred turnover, the rate of the Statistical Dilution Reserve applied to the future transfers can be increased by the difference between the ascertained percentage and 8%.
Payments with subrogation transferred to the Client remain acquired for the fraction of the bad debts exceeding the amount of the outstanding Statistical Dilution reserve; if the amount of unpaid receivables because of declared insolvency at a date is in excess of the RS amount, the resulting loss will remain borne by FCF.
In order to override the financial charge, the Statistical Dilution Reserve is not a part of the calculation of the Financing Fee mentioned in article 8.
The way of proceeding of the Statistical Dilution Reserve is detailed in Annex 7.
4/7
Translation from French to English
Article 7 Authorization of transfer without recourse of the property of the receivables / Price of Acquisition
The maximum amount of financing the Client can use is 60,000,000 (sixty million).
The Client can send at all time a drawdown request to FCF for a determined amount of up to the maximum of 60,000,000, the payment of which shall be imperatively done by bank transfer in the invoicing currency during the afternoon of the day of the request if the request has been sent prior to 10h and on the following day for every request sent after 10h.
In the case where the Current Account available is greater than the outstanding, FCF will transfer the entire excess on a bank account, details of which will have been given by the Client, as soon as such excess be greater than 50,000.
The available counterpart of a transfer form results from:
> the amount, including VAT, of the Eligible Receivables mentioned in the remittance form, plus the return of the available Statistical Dilution Reserve,
> after deduction of the following amounts:
| Non guaranteed transferred receivables; |
| Disputes as defined at article 4.4; |
| Receivables leading the financing on the same debtor exceeding 6 % of the total outstanding eligible receivables for the debtors EDF, CARREFOUR SA and banking institutions, and, over 2 % for any other debtor; |
| Commissions due to FCF, VAT included; |
| Rebates on the turnover or advertising participations due by the Client to the debtors (it is specified that the amounts that are not claimed or deducted by the debtors twelve months after they are payables are not deductible); |
| Constitution of the Statistical Dilution Reserve. |
Transferred Ineligible receivables will be transferred back by FCF to the Client by counterbalance (contrepassation) upon each transfer date.
Article 8: FCFs fees
8-1 Factoring fee
The factoring fee rate, excl. VAT, is fixed at 0.22% of the amount incl. VAT of the transferred Eligible Receivables, for all transferred receivables. The minimum annual fees comprising the factoring fee and the back-up fee defined in article 4 of Schedule No. 2, is fixed at 250.000 (two hundred and fifty thousand euros) excl. VAT. Every semester ,FCF shall compare the fee effectively paid on the grounds of the two fees and the corresponding part of the minimum annual fee, and shall proceed, if applicable, to the relevant regularization so that the collected fee be equivalent to the minimum.
8-2 Financing fee
The financing shall result in a post accounted financing fee, subject to VAT and calculated ad valorem prorata temporis at the rate of 1-month Euribor + a margin of 2.20%, excluding VAT per annum. The benchmark rate for a given month shall be the rate of the last working day of the previous month.
The financing fee, calculated day by day on the balance of the current account, is applied to any remaining due amount by the Client while the current account is not discharged, it being specified that any payment received from a debtor will decrease the financing fee base as soon as it is inscribed on the account.
For example, in order to meet the law, article L.313-4 of the Monetary and Financial Code, the global effective rate applicable on the 01/09/09 would be 2.72% a year, for a financed amount of 60,000,000 (maximum amount available after application of the formula stated in article 7 paragraph 4).
The above rate, which includes a liquidity premium directly linked to the current financial situation and the costs of refinancing of FCF, shall decrease as of January 1st 2010 according to the evolution of the market conditions, without being able to be lower than 1.80 % VAT excluded per annum.
5/7
Translation from French to English
8-2 Audit fees
The Client will contribute to the quarterly audit costs up to 3 000 excluding VAT per audit.
Article 9: Notice
FCF shall give notice to the Client of transactions involving the transferred receivables by sending it the corresponding statements and a monthly summary itemizing the transactions that took place during the previous month.
The Client shall have the use of the electronic data system of FCF.
The Client shall give notice to FCF at once of any event or any plan likely to seriously impact its operations, assets, shareholding structure or any change of its Chairman or its Managing Director. The Client shall provide FCF with a certified balance sheet including the notes thereto and its profit and loss account upon their establishment but no later than the first week of July, it being specified that this documents shall be communicated as drafts if they have not been submitted to the annual general assembly in this timeframe. A copy of the reports certified by the statutory auditors, shall also be communicated upon their availability.
Article 10 : Miscellaneous
The charges and the banking fees (in accordance with the relevant rates), the specific post charges (in accordance with the relevant rates) as well as the fiscal taxes and charges applicable to the operations now or eventually, remain at the Clients charge.
Article 11: Term and termination of the Agreement / Jurisdiction and Governing law
The Agreement is entered into for an unspecified term. Either party may terminate the agreement at any time by means of a letter sent by recorded delivery with advice of delivery (lettre recommandée avec accusé de réception), subject to three months notice.
FCF may terminate the Agreement with a 15 day notice period sent by registered letter with acknowledgment of receipt requested in case of change of control of the Client or Office Depot Group, any substantial change in the Clients legal situation of the conditions of operation of its business (nature, typology of the debtors, ) the substantial deterioration of the financial situation of the Client or the Office Depot Group.
FCF may terminate the Agreement without notice in case of any serious failure by the Client to fulfill its contractual obligations, including any actions by the Client that may prevent FCFs rights from being exercised.
The Client may terminate the Agreement without notice in case of any serious failure by FCF to fulfill its contractual obligations, including any actions by FCF that may prevent the Clients rights from being exercised.
The termination of the Agreement, and after balancing of the operations will automatically lead to the termination of any collateral granted in the framework of the aforementioned Agreement and FCF undertakes to grant any release with effect at the date of the balancing of the operations.
Any dispute relating to this Agreement shall be referred to the Paris Commercial Court (Tribunal de Commerce).
Article 12: Effective date
The Agreement will be effective as of the notification by the Client of its intent to use the financing.
6/7
Translation from French to English
Article 13 : Confidentiality
Each Party undertakes that for the duration of the Agreement and as from its end or termination to:
(i) maintain confidential the clauses of the present Agreement at any time and procure that its employees, agents, representatives and external advisors do same (by exception, the financing partners of the Client will be informed by FCF of the existence of the present agreement);
(ii) refrain from using or disclosing any information of a financing, technical or commercial nature that it could obtain in regard of the business, the company, the goods, the services, the clients and the suppliers of the other Party, with the exception of the information that:
- would be publicly available without it being a result of a breach of the recipient Party; or
- would be made publicly available by an order, a directive or a decision from a court or another competent authority;
- were in possession by the recipient Party before its disclosure;
- would be supplied to such Party by a third party who did not acquire such information under a confidentiality undertaking.
Executed in Puteaux, in two originals, on
OFFICE DEPOT BS SAS * |
FORTIS COMMERCIAL FINANCE SAS * |
* Company stamp and signature of an authorized person
7/7
Exhibit 10.2
Translation from French to English
SCHEDULE N°2
SPECIFICATIONS RELATING TO THE BACK-UP LINE ATTACHED TO THE FINANCING
AGREEMENT WITHOUT RECOURSE OF COMMERCIAL RECEIVABLES BY SUBROGATORY
TRANSFER
BETWEEN: OFFICE DEPOT BS, a French simplified limited company (SAS) with share capital of 148.568.500, whose registered office is located in SENLIS (60300), 126, avenue du Poteau, registered with the Trade and Companies Registry under number 324 559 970, represented by M. Michel Milcent, acting in his capacity as managing director, hereinafter referred to as the Client,
AND: FORTIS COMMERCIAL FINANCE, a French simplified limited company (SAS) with share capital of 33,865,055 whose registered office is located at 30, Quai de Dion Bouton, PUTEAUX (92800), registered with the Trade and Companies Registry under number 342 227 576, represented by M. Olivier Dhuime, acting in his capacity as managing director, hereinafter referred to as FCF,
Article 1: Confirmed credit line Back-Up - Effective date of the Agreement - Termination
In the framework of the management of the financing of its business concern, the Client wished to dispose, which has been accepted by FCF, of a confirmed credit line without recourse based on commercial receivables, which can be activated upon the Clients own initiative, and that is in this intent that the Agreement For The Financing Without Recourse of Commercial Receivables, hereafter the Agreement, has been concluded.
FCF grants the Client a confirmed credit line of Back-Up for a 3 month period, from date to date, which is renewed daily as from the date of signature of the present supplemental agreement.
Under the conditions of a favorable audit and the approval of its Credit Committee, FCF will be authorized to raise the period of confirmation of its commitment up to 6 months; in this case, the confirmation commission defined in article 4 hereafter shall be increased by 10 base points.
The Agreement is entered into for an unspecified term. Each party can terminate it subject to a 3-month notice. The termination of the Agreement implies the automatic termination of the Back-Up line.
Article 2: Activation/Deactivation of the Agreement
The Client may activate the Agreement at any time simply by sending to FCF a registered letter with acknowledgment of receipt (lettre recommandée avec accusé de réception).
The Agreement will be activated within 3 working days from the receipt of the Clients demand for a credit line of up to 19,500,000 (nineteen million five hundred thousand euros) and within 10 working days for any amount beyond that sum and up to 60,000,000 (sixteen million euros). By exception, should the Client activate the Agreement in September 2009, and provided that the formalism of the transfers be respected, the above mentioned financing deadlines are reduced to 2 working days after the receipt of the transfer file, including in respect of the financing line of 60,000,000 (sixteen million euros).
Parties agree that, except on specific cases, the Client may activate or deactivate the Agreement for a minimum of 6 month-periods.
The Client can activate or deactivate the Agreement 10 working days before the end of each Client accountancy quarter, for the payment of a fee defined in article 4 to the present document. On an exceptional basis, the Client will have the option to activate or deactivate the Agreement before the expiry of a 6 month-period, for the payment of an increase of the activation/deactivation fee in accordance with the conditions stated at article 4 to the present document.
1/2
Translation from French to English
On the date upon which the Agreement is deactivated, the Back Up facility will automatically come into force again.
Article 3: Audit fees
In order to enable the activation of the Agreement in the best possible conditions, the parties agree that the provisions of article 8-3 of the Agreement shall be effective upon signature of the present supplemental agreement.
The Clients contribution to the quarterly audit costs fixed at 3,000 excluding VAT, shall be payable in advance, at the beginning of each civil quarter.
In case the Agreement is activated, its article 8.3 shall come into force. Consequently the present article 3 shall no longer be applied.
Article 4: « Back-Up » fees
The Client will pay an annual Back-Up fee, subject to VAT, composed of a commitment fee equal to 100 base points, and a confirmation fee equal to 30 base points, pursuant to the authorization as defined in the Agreement ( 60,000,000 - sixty million - at this day), i.e. a total sum of 780,000 (seven hundred eighty thousand) per year, excluding VAT. It is specified that this fee is payable, on a prorate basis, only for the period during which the Agreement is not activated.
The Back-Up fee is payable by twelfth (65,000 - sixty-five hundred excluding taxes) and in advance, on the 25th of each month. In case the Agreement is activated, the Back-Up fee is no more due as from the month of the first financing (availability of the funds). Exceptionally, on the 25th of a month, the Client can request that payment for the back up fees invoice of the following month be delayed for a period of 15 days (until the 10th of the following month).
Consequently the Back-up fee shall not be added up to the factoring fee in respect of the same month.
If the Agreement is not activated at the date of the 10th of the following month, the Client will have to pay the Back-Up fee due pursuant to the present month within the next 48 hours.
Activation / Deactivation fee: after the first activation of the Agreement, the Client will pay the amount of 25,000 VAT excluded for each activation or deactivation of the Agreement. The amount of this fee will be increased by 15.000 VAT excluded in case when the activation/deactivation operates before the end of a 6 month-period.
Article 5: Miscellaneous
The provisions of article 11 and 13 of the Agreement shall apply.
OFFICE DEPOT BS SAS* |
FORTIS COMMERCIAL FINANCE SAS* |
* Company stamp and signature of an authorized person
2/2
Exhibit 10.3
SEVENTH AMENDMENT TO AMENDED AND RESTATED
MERCHANT SERVICES AGREEMENT
This SEVENTH AMENDMENT (this Amendment) to the Amended and Restated Merchant Services Agreement dated as of February 1, 2004 between CITIBANK (SOUTH DAKOTA), N.A., successor to CITIBANK (USA), N.A. (Bank) and OFFICE DEPOT, INC. (the Company) is dated as of this 13th day of October 2009.
WHEREAS, Bank and Company entered into a certain Amended and Restated Merchant Services Agreement dated as of February 1, 2004 (the Agreement), as amended; and
WHEREAS, Bank and Company wish to revise the Agreement in certain respects, as described below.
NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the mutual covenants contained in this Amendment, and intending to be legally bound, the parties agree as follows:
1. Amendment to Section 6.2(b). Section 6.2(b) is hereby amended as follows:
(a) By replacing clause (iv) in its entirety with the following new clause (iv):
(iv) by Bank or Company upon thirty (30) days notice to the other party in the event the other party or the other partys parent sells, merges, consolidates or transfers twenty percent (20%) or more of the other partys business or assets (excluding, for the avoidance of doubt, any sale or transfer of the capital stock of such other party), without obtaining the prior written consent, as required under Section 6.7 of this Agreement.
(b) By adding the following new clause (vi) in numerical order:
(vi) by Bank upon thirty (30) days prior written notice to Company in the event that any person or group (within the meaning of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and the rules of the Securities and Exchange Commission thereunder as in effect on the date hereof) acquires ownership of, directly or indirectly, beneficially (within the meaning of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and the rules of the Securities and Exchange Commission thereunder as in effect on the date hereof) or of record, more than 40% of the aggregate voting power represented by the issued and outstanding capital stock of Company.
2. No Other Amendment. Except as expressly set forth in this Amendment, the Agreement and all Exhibits and Schedules to the Agreement shall remain in full force and effect.
3. Governing Law. This Amendment will be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of the State of New York without regard to that states conflict of laws provisions.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have caused this Amendment to be executed as of the date first above written.
CITIBANK (SOUTH DAKOTA), N.A. | OFFICE DEPOT, INC. | |||||||
By: |
|
By: |
| |||||
Name: |
|
Name: |
| |||||
Title: |
|
Title: |
| |||||
Date: |
|
Date: |
|
Rule 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a) Certification
I, Steve Odland, certify that:
1. | I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Office Depot, Inc.; |
2. | Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report; |
3. | Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report; |
4. | The registrants other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for the registrant and have: |
a) | Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared; |
b) | Designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such internal control over financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles; |
c) | Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and |
d) | Disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrants most recent fiscal quarter (the registrants fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrants internal control over financial reporting; and |
5. | The registrants other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrants independent registered public accounting firm and the audit committee of the registrants board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions): |
a) | All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and |
b) | Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrants internal control over financial reporting. |
Date: October 29, 2009
/s/ Steve Odland
Steve Odland
Chief Executive Officer and Chairman, Board of Directors
Rule 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a) Certification
I, Michael D. Newman, certify that:
1. | I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Office Depot, Inc.; |
2. | Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report; |
3. | Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report; |
4. | The registrants other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for the registrant and have: |
a) | Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared; |
b) | Designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such internal control over financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles; |
c) | Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and |
d) | Disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrants most recent fiscal quarter (the registrants fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrants internal control over financial reporting; and |
5. | The registrants other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrants independent registered public accounting firm and the audit committee of the registrants board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions): |
a) | All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and |
b) | Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrants internal control over financial reporting. |
Date: October 29, 2009
/s/ Michael D. Newman
Michael D. Newman
Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
Office Depot, Inc.
Certification of CEO and CFO Pursuant to
18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as Adopted Pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Office Depot, Inc. (the Company) for the quarterly period ended September 26, 2009 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), Steve Odland, as Chief Executive Officer of the Company, and Michael D. Newman, as Chief Financial Officer of the Company, each hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to each officers knowledge:
(1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and |
(2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. |
/s/ Steve Odland | ||
Name: | Steve Odland | |
Title: | Chief Executive Officer | |
Date: | October 29, 2009 |
/s/ Michael D. Newman | ||
Name: | Michael D. Newman | |
Title: | Chief Financial Officer | |
Date: | October 29, 2009 |
A signed original of this written statement required by Section 1350 of Title 18 of the United States Code has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
The foregoing certification is being furnished as an exhibit to the Report pursuant to Item 601(b)(32) of Regulation S-K and Section 1350 of Title 18 of the United States Code and, accordingly, is not being filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission as part of the Report and is not to be incorporated by reference into any filing of the Company under the Securities Act of 1933 or the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (whether made before or after the date of the Report, irrespective of any general incorporation language contained in such filing).